[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Victory for villagers in Churchover windfarm battle 

Credit:  Rugby Advertiser | 29 April 2014 | www.rugbyadvertiser.co.uk ~~

Villagers are celebrating after planners rejected an application to build a windfarm near Rugby.

Energy company RES wanted to install four 100m-tall turbines in on the Swift Valley, by Churchover.

But Rugby Borough Council’s planning committee last week refused permission amid fears the masts would interfere with air traffic control signals.

And Dr Chris Down, a member of a campaign group opposing the plan, is among those delighted with the outcome. He said: “We believes local democracy was at stake, with every local parish council, Lutterworth Town, Harborough District and Leicestershire County Councils, our MP, English Heritage, CPRE, ramblers, birders, riders, fishers and over 90 per cnet of residents objecting.”

RES had claimed the windfarm would bring economic benefits – but this is contested by fellow campaigner Lorne Smith. He said: “RES have repeatedly propagandised their wind turbines in economic terms but people with common-sense, who may like the concept of renewables, know that the primary purpose of wind turbines and solar farms is to generate money for land owners, overseas manufacturers and development speculators at the expense of the public and increased fuel poverty, at which they are very efficient.”

RES meanwhile has voiced dismay at the verdict. Dave Cox, the company’s head of development in England, said: ““We were very disappointed. We have been able to clearly show that the wind farm would have no significant effects on local people, the environment or wildlife. The only concern raised was with regard to the air-ground-air communications mast at Pailton Radio Station. There is no evidence that windfarms interfere with this technology.”

He added: “We will be reviewing the committee’s reasons for rejecting the proposal in some detail and considering our options in the face of this negative decision.”

Source:  Rugby Advertiser | 29 April 2014 | www.rugbyadvertiser.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky