LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Air traffic fear over turbines 

Credit:  Bridlington Free Press | 24 April 2014 | www.bridlingtonfreepress.co.uk ~~

Controversial plans to build two wind turbines at Beeford have been given the go ahead – scotching concerns that they would affect air traffic radar.

The East Riding of Yorkshire Council turned down a planning application to build two turbines with a blade height of 34.2m on land west of West Farm, Foston Lane.

But the decision was overturned following a planning appeal by Phitwherry Ltd.

Government appointed planning inspector Andrew Hammond said: “The main issue in this appeal is whether the proposed wind turbines would result in false returns or other unacceptable effects on the Claxby primary surveillance radar.”

The council’s sole reason for refusal was on grounds that the proposed development would have an unacceptable impact on civil aviation in that Claxby radar and, as a result, Prestwick air traffic control, would be affected by the proposal having an adverse impact on air traffic safety.

In reaching its decision, the council relied on representations made by National Air Traffic Services who are responsible for aircraft operating in controlled airspace in the UK.

The PSR antenna radiates electromagnetic energy and detects echoes which are interpreted by the radar system to provide information to the operator.

It was the contention of the NERL that the proposed wind turbines would add to clutter, both increasing the workload of air traffic controllers and potentially masking real aircraft.

It was further maintained that it was possible that false tracks could occur as a result of the proposed turbines.

Mr Hammond said: “It has not been demonstrated that the proposed turbines would add significantly to any impact on the operation of the Claxby Primary Surveillance Radar. The proposed development would not therefore be detrimental to aviation safety.”

Source:  Bridlington Free Press | 24 April 2014 | www.bridlingtonfreepress.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky