[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Maryland’s $200M wind energy project in tug-of-war battle 

Credit:  By David Collins | WBAL | Apr. 24, 2014 | www.wbaltv.com ~~

Gov. Martin O’Malley faces quite a conundrum involving a $200 million wind energy project.

If he allows the project to go forward, he risks losing the multibillion-dollar Patuxent Naval Air Base operating in Maryland.

At issue at issue is whether wind turbines will interfere with radar testing at the base.

O’Malley has been inundated with letters, calls and face-to-face pleas urging him to veto a bill postponing the project. The developer warns any delay will kill it.

Renewable energy is part of the governor’s legacy. His administration testified in opposition to the bill.

Perhaps one clue in his thought process is in early March the Navy gave him a classified briefing on what’s at stake.

“Today, things are worse than they were when I left 35-40 years ago,” said Maryann Peterman.

Maryann Peterman and her husband Rick live on a 142-acre farm in a house built by her family in 1840. The retired teachers want to keep the property in the family for generations to come. They’re hoping the wind has the power to change their lives and their neighbor’s fortunes.

“We would welcome an opportunity for an additional income stream. The wind turbine that we are slated to get would give us that income stream,” Rick Peterman said.

The Petermans agreed to lease their field to pioneer Green Energy of Princess Anne for at least $20,000 a year.

They’ll build a 600-foot wind turbine – one of 25 planned for the area. Another 25 turbines will be constructed later.

“(That’s) for a total of 150 megawatts, which would power about 45,000 homes with clean, pollution-free energy,” Adam Cohen said.

The company chose Maryland because of the governor’s mandate for the state to use 20 percent of renewable energy by 2022. The company has spent $4 million over the past five years ramping up the project.

One wind-measuring tower is the only sign of things to come.

According to a study by the University of Baltimore, the project will infuse $273 million into Somerset County. Initially, it will generate 529 jobs and as many as 64 permanent ones.

Somerset gets $2.9 million in additional tax revenue each year.

“I tell you, when you are looking at one of the economically-challenged jurisdictions in the state, this is a big project,” said Danny Thompson, Somerset County director of economic development.

A really big deal in an area where unemployment is 10.4 percent and 18.6 percent of the population lives below the poverty level.

Opposition by elected officials representing the Patuxent Naval Air Station has jeopardized the project.

The base tests radar signatures of aircraft. There’s concern wind turbines will interfere with the station’s radar systems.

St. Mary’s County Democrat Delegate John Bohanan pushed a bill through the General Assembly putting a moratorium on turbines for a year so MIT can study the impact.

“We need to look at the entire impact of that project. The economic impact, the environmental impact and make sure it is right for our state,” Bohanan said.

Turbine opponents argue that Patuxent, a multibillion-dollar economic engine for the state, will leave if the project lives.

“The Californians have been looking forward to pulling Patuxent out to California and they have a huge, huge desert area where they would have no impact whatsoever,” said Sen. Roy Dyson, D-St. Mary’s County.

Pioneer Green and the Navy hammered out an MOU based on a solution offered by MIT researchers.

“If we shut down our turbines during testing times the radar would not be impacted,” Cohen said.

But elected officials intervened, stopping the agreement from going up the chain of command.

“If this bill goes into law, our project cannot move forward,” Cohen said.

The Petermans consider the turbine project a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.

“I think it is an insidious kind of thing to have legislation of this sort where you have the economic interest of a well-developed area, being pushed ahead of the most economic impoverished area of the state,” Rick Peterman said.

According to the House clerk, the governor was presented with the legislation on Thursday.

He now has 30 days to sign it, let it go into effect without his signature or veto the measure. The next bill signing is May 5.

Source:  By David Collins | WBAL | Apr. 24, 2014 | www.wbaltv.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky