[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Windmill opponents occupy MOEA 

Credit:  Taiwan News, Staff Writer | 2014-04-16 | www.etaiwannews.com ~~

In a move reminiscent of the 24-day occupation of the Legislative Yuan, opponents of a windmill park in Miaoli County on Wednesday occupied the inner court of the Ministry of Economic Affairs.

Students occupied a large part of the legislative compound from March 18 to April 10 in protest against the ruling Kuomintang’s efforts for a quick passage of the trade-in-services pact with China.

Around 10 a.m. Wednesday, about 20 members of an action group in the Miaoli County township of Yuanli entered the MOEA through the main gate. They oppose the construction of modern windmills too close to an inhabited area because of alleged noise and other pollution. The distance in this case was less than 250 meters, they said.

The protesters accused the MOEA of having twice extended a permit for the construction by Germany’s InfraVest Wind Power Group without previous consultation with the residents.

In another reminder of the recent student protests, the Black Island Nation Youth Front called on its members to “walk by” the MOEA. The method of protest was used repeatedly during student protests against a television station, lawmakers and the police in order to avoid legislation requiring official applications for static protest rallies.

After a couple of hours under the hot sun, the protest association’s vice chairman, Yeh Ting-kuei, reportedly fainted and was transported to a nearby hospital.

A government official came out to talk to the protesters, but as he failed to make any promises, the talks ended unsuccessfully. Police were expected to take action against the sit-in.

Online, the new protest action sparked a heated debate, with some commentators attacking the protesters for opposing a green form of energy, while others said the only problem was that government and business had neglected basic experience from overseas, where most new windmills were built at a distance from homes sufficient to avoid wind turbine syndrome.

Members of the Yuanli action group have occupied the construction site for more than 6,000 hours or for more than a year, reports said. They occasionally staged protests outside the MOEA and in front of the Presidential Office Building. A first attempt to occupy the MOEA last January ended quickly after police expelled them.

InfraVest reportedly promised that its windmills would be built at a distance of three to five times the length of the turbine’s blades away from the homes. However, nine of the 14 turbines in Yuanli were closer than that distance, causing complaints of insomnia and headaches from residents.

In a separate development, prosecutors were expected to start questioning suspects in the April 11 siege of the Zhongzheng First Precinct police station in Taipei on Thursday, reports said.

Groups of students and activists angry at the removal of Professor Tsay Ting-kuei’s Taiwan Referendum Association from the sidewalk outside the Legislative Yuan besieged the precinct station for hours, accusing local police chief Fang Yang-ning of having violated the Constitution by cutting short the TRA’s permission to protest at the original site.

The siege ended after Fang apologized and promised to step down, but Taipei City Mayor Hau Lung-bin later announced he would not accept the police officer’s resignation until an investigation had found problems with his handling of the case.

Source:  Taiwan News, Staff Writer | 2014-04-16 | www.etaiwannews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky