[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Right across the county line  

Credit:  By Scott Smith, Tribune columnist | Kokomo Tribune | April 13, 2014 | www.kokomotribune.com ~~

Grant County has wind problems, and as an editor recently and quite rightly noted, “Wind doesn’t care about county lines.”

So Grant County’s issues over a proposed E-On Climate & Renewables wind farm are becoming Howard County’s issues as well.

If the Grant County project – now stalled by a standoff between that county’s council and commissioners – doesn’t move ahead, it doesn’t bode well for the likelihood of E-On continuing its planned project on the Howard County side of the line.

To remind Howard County residents, E-On has plans for two wind farms here.

One, consisting of 12 smaller turbines, would sit in western Howard County, along the Tipton County line stretching west and north from County Road 1000 West.

The second, much larger in size, would cover the northeast corner of the county, starting about a mile and a half northeast of Greentown. The Grant County project would be adjacent to it.

Over in Marion, E-On managed to arrange the same kind of “streamlined” approval process that Howard County officials agreed to in 2009.

That means E-On’s plans aren’t dependent on a public hearing and a subsequent vote by county officials. As Grant County’s area planning director, Steve Niblick, puts it, “If [E-On] came in today for a permit … they’d be started.”

But E-On hasn’t started, and they haven’t shared their reasons for holding off with Grant County officials.

There’s speculation that the energy markets aren’t supportive of new wind farms right now, but there’s also the issue of the Grant County Council, which hasn’t yet approved an amended economic development agreement with E-On.

The Grant County Commissioners signed the new deal last year, but the council has balked, perhaps because four council members are facing re-election this year. Again, I’m speculating a bit.

The amended agreement also provides an extension on the project’s tax abatement. The company asked for the extension, because a clause in the original abatement stated the company had to begin construction by the end of 2013.

Whether the abatement is still in place is a matter of great debate in Marion, with members of the council saying no, E-On officials and the commissioners saying yes, and the council’s attorney calling it a gray area.

The commissioners obviously see the new deal as an improvement over the first agreement they signed with E-On, since it includes greater setback requirements.

If the council doesn’t approve it, E-On has suggested it could move forward under the previous agreement.

There are massive similarities between Grant County’s dilemma and Howard County’s, including efforts to try to appease wind opponents by brokering a new deal with E-On. Howard County’s new deal, signed last year, even includes another $500,000 for the county, along with bigger setbacks.

Whether any of this will be enough to satisfy opponents is another matter.

And over both counties, the possibility E-On officials simply walk into the plan commission, pay a fee and submit plans, hangs over everything.

With wind opponents coming to every meeting, Grant County’s council members have yet to take a vote on the new deal, which has been in their laps since December.

Pressure, it seems, doesn’t pay much attention to county lines either.

Source:  By Scott Smith, Tribune columnist | Kokomo Tribune | April 13, 2014 | www.kokomotribune.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch