LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Court grants partial victory to opponents of Sempra’s cross-border transmission line project 

Credit:  By Miriam Raftery | East County Magazine | April 5, 2014 | eastcountymagazine.org ~~

U.S. District Court Judge M. James Lorenz has issued a ruling in a case challenging the U.S. Department of Energy’s approval of a Presidential Permit issued for Sempra Energy’s cross-border transmission line. The line would connect Sempra’s Energia Sierra Juarez Wind project in northern Baja, Mexico with SDG&E’s $435 million ECO substation now under construction.

“We secured a ruling that presidential permits are subject to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), National Enviornmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other federal environmental laws,” said Donna Tisdale, a plaintiff in the case along with the Protect Our Communities Foundation et all. In addition, she noted, “We are entitled to amend our complaint to address the potential liability under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Eagle Act,of operators who construct and operate wind turbine facilities that will directly kill or take migratory birds and eagles.”

Plaintiffs had sought injunctive and declaratory relief against defendants for violating multiple environmental statutes in connection with issuance of the presidential permit. Judge Lorenz granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss in part, but denied it in part, finding “it is clear that this Court has been tasked tdo review agency actions such as the issuance of a Presidential permit by an agency,” among other points.

View the full decision here.

Source:  By Miriam Raftery | East County Magazine | April 5, 2014 | eastcountymagazine.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky