[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Campaigners lay down arms in fight against wind turbine plan 

Credit:  Suffolk Free Press | 05 April 2014 | www.suffolkfreepress.co.uk ~~

Attempts to have permission for a 250ft wind turbine in Clare revoked – after similar plans were rejected nearby – have come to nothing.

Suffolk County councillor Julian Flood called for the approval of the 78-metre high turbine in Chilton Street to be reassessed earlier this year.

This followed the decision of St Edmundbury Borough Council’s development committee to reject proposals for another wind turbine in Haverhill.

Like the Clare turbine, which was granted planning consent a year ago, landowner James Sills was behind the scheme.

Mr Flood said the latest committee ruling left the Clare application in considerable doubt and he would write to the council to recommend the decision was recalled.

“The same objections apply in both cases, and it is my opinion that the same errors were made in both assessments,” he said.

“The benefits were overstated, the amenity damage was underestimated, loss of property value was not considered and the damage to wildlife study was sketchy.”

Mr Flood has now learnt, however, that there is no hope of challenging the controversial scheme.

“I have tried but I am afraid it is too late to get it called in and rejected,” he said.

“I have taken legal advice and I am afraid that, as far as current legislation goes, there is no simple way of stopping it.”

Iona Parker, a member of the Stop Turbines Over Clare (Stoc) action group, said she was still “appalled” that the Clare wind turbine had been passed but accepted nothing could be done.

“We have looked at all the options, the most obvious of which was a judicial review, but the costs involved make that difficult and there is no guarantee,” said Mrs Parker.

“It is frustrating as the grounds for refusal were much stronger in our case than in Haverhill.”

Mrs Parker added that she believed Mr Sills’ estimate, that the turbine would provide enough power for 319 homes, was way off the mark, and it would damage the landscape.

Earlier proposals from BT for three wind turbines in Clare were dropped after research found there was not enough wind to make them financially worthwhile.

“Some of the wind calculations were miles out and it was being claimed there would be more wind here than somewhere like the north of Scotland,” said Mrs Parker.

“Our only hope is that it is not viable as it is down to how much money it will make.

“There are no signs of construction at the moment.”

Mr Flood said communities forced to live with a wind farm should be given the power to tax them at punitive rates which, in turn, may deter potential developers.

“Wind farms lower house prices and home owners should be compensated,” he said.

“Why should wind farm developers profit from others’ misery? They should not, and I will try my damnedest to make sure they don’t.”

A handful of groups, including Clare Parish Council, English Heritage and Stour Valley Project, had opposed the plans.

Source:  Suffolk Free Press | 05 April 2014 | www.suffolkfreepress.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon