[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

House advances bill to give Unorganized Territory more say in wind development  

Credit:  By Mario Moretto, BDN Staff | Bangor Daily News | March 31, 2014 | bangordailynews.com ~~

AUGUSTA, Maine – After a floor debate featuring soaring rhetoric about democracy and self-determination, the House on Monday advanced a bill aimed at giving residents of Maine’s vast Unorganized Territory a new way to slow down wind development.

Since 2008, about one-third of the Unorganized Territory has been categorized as an “expedited permitting area,” meaning wind development is considered, by default, a permitted use. Some residents of the sparsely populated Maine wilderness have criticized the designation as a means to cut them out of the decision-making process.

The bill would allow a majority of voting residents from any Unorganized Territory to petition the Land Use Planning Commission to have their township or plantation removed from the expedited permitting area. If the commission grants their request, any wind developer would have to go through a rezoning process with the commission, in addition to the Department of Environmental Protection permitting process already required.

The law would give residents two years to file such petitions.

Advocates for the bill, LD 616, said the measure is an effort to restore democratic principles for residents of the Unorganized Territory in the expedited permitting zone.

“This is not a wind bill. … It’s a restoration of citizens’ rights that were taken away from roughly 1 percent of Maine citizens,” said Rep. Larry Dunphy, R-Embden, the bill’s sponsor.

But Jeremy Payne, executive director of the Maine Renewable Energy Association, said that argument was a red herring. Residents of the Unorganized Territory have most of their affairs determined by the state – including decisions on budgets, education, forest management and public safety, Payne said.

He said that if Unorganized Territory residents want to be able to craft zoning rules, they should organize into municipalities.

“Of course they don’t want that,” he said. “The cost of reorganizing is increased property taxes. But I don’t think, as a matter of policy, we can allow the Unorganized Territory to have their cake and eat it too.”

Roughly 9,000 Mainers live in the Unorganized Territory, or about 0.6 percent of the state’s entire population. Before the Wind Energy Act was signed in 2008, wind developers had to have property in the UT rezoned – a vigorous process that included comment from residents of the township or plantation and beyond.

LD 616 would restore that process for communities that are successful in having their communities extracted from the expedited permitting area.

Some of the 48 lawmakers who opposed the bill on Monday said that’s too much to ask. They pointed to legislation passed last year that gave UT residents a public hearing during the DEP permitting process, and said it was unnecessary to add an earlier period for residents to air their grievances.

And, because the law would stop any potential development from being approved in a community that has filed a petition with the Land Use Planning Commission, opponents said the law would create uncertainty in the wind market – an area where the state has committed itself to investment.

“If this bill passes, and there’s a very real chance it may, it will create an environment that will set us back in wind power,” said Rep. Diane Russell, D-Portland. “But maybe that’s what some folks want.”

The bill faces additional votes in the House and Senate.

Source:  By Mario Moretto, BDN Staff | Bangor Daily News | March 31, 2014 | bangordailynews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch