[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Dark Sky claims unfounded 

Credit:  31st March 2014 | www.scotsman.com ~~

Last Sunday you published an article titled “Dark Sky chief quit over wind farm ­pressure”. It contained completely unfounded allegations made by a former employee, Robert Ince, and Professor John Brown that I had exerted pressure.

Although the article referred to my absolute rebuttal of the allegations, the headline effectively implied that they were true.

I told your reporter that Ince’s decision to resign was his alone and that he had, at no time, been put under any pressure from me or anyone else with regard to the Scottish Dark Sky Observatory’s position on any wind farm proposal. It would indeed not have been possible for me to do so as I am only one of the trustees and decisions are taken by all trustees.

Very importantly, Ince’s resignation letter to the trustees commences with the following statement: “You will all be aware of the circumstances leading up to my resignation but I will still document them here to avoid any future misrepresentation.” It then continues for two pages, making not one single reference to wind farms or pressure over wind farm objections.

The headline presented the reasons for Ince leaving as fact, not a claim. Although the subsequent text talked of “claims”, as you well know, the headline is what readers ­remember.

J Mark Gibson, Craigengillan, Dalmellington, Ayr

Mark Gibson wrote to SoS today, referring to the March 23 SoS piece about resignations at the Scottish Dark Skies Observatory (SDSO).

His letter claims “[The article] contained completely unfounded allegations made by … Professor John Brown that I [MG] had exerted pressure…”

Anyone reading it will find I made no such allegations in the SOS article (nor in my resignation letter) simply giving my main reason for resignation as “…the collapse of my efforts to mediate in rows between Craigengillan and SDSO over issues including wind farm objections …”

In the article one of the three Trustees who quit cited similar reasons.

A retracton would be in order

John C Brown,

Astronomer Royal for Scotland

Source:  31st March 2014 | www.scotsman.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky