Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Aho’s misdeeds
Credit: Bangor Daily News | Posted March 27, 2014 | bangordailynews.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Superior Court Justice Michaela Murphy’s decision regarding a wind turbine project on Vinalhaven is a crucial decision whose implications have less to do with wind energy than with whether Maine’s environment is safe in the hands of Department of Environmental Protection Commissioner Patricia Aho.
Murphy found that Aho gutted project requirements carefully formulated by the attorney general’s office and DEP’s technical staff. Aho intervened soon after leaving her lobbying job with a Portland law firm, thereby assisting the project developers, who were and continue to be clients of that same law firm.
Murphy found “no competent evidence” and “no rational basis” to support Aho’s decision. Aho’s behavior could reasonably be “viewed as antithetical to the common notions of impartiality which Maine citizens understandably expect from decision makers in Maine agencies,” Murphy wrote, suggesting Aho not participate further.
That’s not likely, however. Aho has waged a prolonged fight against the neighbors who brought this case, claiming that the court has no authority to review her decision and that the neighbors can’t challenge her decisions in court.
Aho’s personal intervention (not DEP’s) has cost Maine taxpayers and the neighbors dearly. The developer is quoted as having paid $1 million in legal fees. (To whom? Aho’s law firm, presumably.)
Unfortunately, this is only the latest in a long list of Aho’s misdeeds. She may be great for her former law firm and its clients, but she is a disaster for Maine.
The LePage administration has abused a sacred trust by subverting its environmental responsibilities to personal and insider agendas.
George Schelling
Orland
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: