[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

House rejects bill repealing Kansas’ RPS energy mandate  

Credit:  By Tim Carpenter | The Topeka Capital-Journal | March 26, 2014 | cjonline.com ~~

A bipartisan coalition in the House refused to accept a controversial Senate bill Wednesday to repeal a state law mandating utility companies acquire 20 percent of electricity from renewable sources by 2020.

Legislation tied to renewable portfolio standards strikes an array of diverse political interests ranging from Gov. Sam Brownback’s consistent advocacy for Kansas wind farms, lawmakers intent on expanding employment with alternative energy companies as well as legislators and lobbying groups opposed to government mandates and regulation of the energy sector.

Critics of Kansas’ RPS provisions adopted in 2009 expressed frustration construction of a coal-fired plant in Holcomb has yet to proceed. The Republican-led Legislature and Democratic Gov. Mark Parkinson agreed to include removal of a key regulatory stumbling block to that southwest Kansas plant expansion in the same bill establishing the RPS.

Conflicting statements were offered during House debate on the law’s influence on wind farms and the coal industry, influence on consumer electric rates and impact on management of regulated utility companies.

“It certainly got windy in here,” said Rep. Randy Garber, the Sabetha Republican who made the motion to concur with the Senate. “I support removing this RPS mandate. I support choice – free choice.”

The measure to repeal standards in Kansas in House Bill 2014 was approved Tuesday by the Senate on a vote of 25-15. However, the House followed lengthy debate by voting 44-77 against acceptance of the Senate’s position.

Source:  By Tim Carpenter | The Topeka Capital-Journal | March 26, 2014 | cjonline.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.