LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Court upholds wind turbine siting rules 

Credit:  By Fox 11 News | Published: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 | fox11online.com ~~

The state appeals Tuesday rejected claims the state’s wind turbine siting rules are invalid.

The Wisconsin Realtors Association, Wisconsin Builders Association, Wisconsin Towns Association and others filed suit, claiming that Public Service Commission rule 128 is invalid because it was installed without a housing impact report. A Brown County judge upheld the PSC’s rules and Tuesday’s decision affirmed that ruling.

” In summary, we reject WRA’s argument that PSC 128 is invalid because it was promulgated without a housing impact report. Wisconsin Stat. § 227.115(2) does not require preparation of a housing impact report whenever the subject matter of a proposed rule relates to housing. Instead, a housing impact report is required only when the proposed rule directly or substantially affects the development, construction, cost, or availability of housing in Wisconsin. The Commission must make the initial determination, either explicit or implicit, whether a housing impact report is required. Here, the Commission submitted PSC 128 to the legislature without a housing impact report after considering voluminous evidence about wind energy systems’ effects on housing and reasonably concluding wind energy systems do not negatively affect residential property values. We must presume PSC 128 was duly promulgated, and the Commission has not cited any evidence to rebut that presumption. Accordingly, the circuit court properly granted the Commission summary judgment,” the court wrote.

Source:  By Fox 11 News | Published: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 | fox11online.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon