| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Woman wins open meetings fight over wind turbines
Credit: Written by Eric Litke, Gannett Wisconsin Media Investigative Team | Mar. 14, 2014 | www.postcrescent.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
CASCADE – Susan Lodl was taken aback when she and other residents in the Sheboygan County village of Cascade received postcards in 2009 describing plans to use about $500,000 of village money on two wind turbines to power a new wastewater treatment plant.
The former village board member was even more surprised to learn at the next board meeting that the expenditure was “basically a done deal,” said Lodl, 62.
That sparked a yearlong investigation into the village’s prior meetings and agendas. Lodl said she found a pattern of vague and misleading agenda items that failed to give residents proper notice and a chance for input.
Among her discoveries: a vote at an April 14, 2009, meeting to hire a consultant for the wind turbine project despite no mention on the agenda, and a discussion on the turbines at a Feb. 10, 2009, meeting under the agenda heading, “Sewer and water – 2nd well/ facility plant update.”
In June 2010, Lodl filed a complaint with the district attorney. When she got no response, she filed a civil lawsuit alleging an array of open meetings violations from 2008 to 2011.
She spent two years and more than $8,000 in attorney fees before reaching a settlement with the village in September 2012.
In exchange for Lodl dismissing the lawsuit, the village agreed to cover her legal bills, have current and future officials attend training on open meetings compliance, and reconfigure its meeting space so board members faced the audience instead of having their backs to them. The village also published a notice detailing the settlement terms and its “commitment to open government” in two local newspapers.
“It’s been a lot of years and a lot of work, but I’m glad I did it,” said Lodl, who has lived in Cascade since 1974. “If they have learned from it, all the better, and if anyone else can learn from this, I hope it helps them out, too. … it’s very intimidating for a John Doe public citizen to do such a thing.”
The turbines were ultimately built – across the street from Lodl’s house – but she says they have failed to produce the energy and money savings the village projected.
“We have close to a half-million invested in two turbines out here that aren’t even doing what they’re supposed to do,” Lodl said. “If the meetings were run properly, this might not have happened.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=62294 ]
