[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Senate OKs bill to create wind farm moratorium east of I-35  

Credit:  By BARBARA HOBEROCK, World Capitol Bureau | Tulsa World | March 13, 2014 | www.tulsaworld.com ~~

The Oklahoma Senate on Monday passed a bill that would create three-year moratorium on the building of wind farms east of Interstate 35.

Senate Bill 1440, by Senate Pro Tem Brian Bingman, R-Sapulpa, passed by a vote of 32-8 and heads to the House, where Rep. Earl Sears, R-Bartlesville, is the House author.

Sears said the moratorium is needed so lawmakers can learn more about the impact the wind farms have on property and the environment.

Curt Roggow, a lobbyist for the Wind Coalition, a regional trade organization, said his group is opposed to the bill.

He said the legislation is the result of a dispute between two large property owners in the eastern part of the state. One neighbor wants to tell the other neighbor what he can’t do with his land, Roggow said.

The dispute needs to be resolved locally in a manner that does not jeopardize developments in the rest of the state, Roggow said.

A moratorium means billions of dollars will be turned away in additional investments, Roggow said.

“It also violates private property rights that landowners have to use those resources to build their operations,” Roggow said.

Frank Robson is a Claremore businessman and founder of the recently formed Oklahoma Property Rights Association.

He said his neighbor wanted to put a wind farm in. He said wind farms are harmful to a person’s health, the environment and would devalue his property.

“It will be a slaughterhouse in the sky,” Robson said.

Currently, there is no regulation of the wind industry, Robson said.
“There has to be a period of time where you can get a regulation to be equitable to the wind people and be equitable to the land owner worked out,” he said.

Sen. Brian Crain, R-Tulsa, voted for the measure.

He said policy makers need to learn from some of the problems that occurred in western part of the state. Wind farms are a fairly recent development and have exploded in number, he said. The state needs to move forward on what it can do for property owners, he said.


The Senate passed a bill that would require abortion clinics to have on-site a doctor with admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the abortion clinic when the procedure is performed.

Sen. Greg Treat, R-Oklahoma City, is the author of Senate Bill 1848, which passed 34-8 and heads to the House. Treat said the measure is designed to protect the health of women.

“What is eminently clear is that the intent of this legislation is not to provide the best evidence-based care to women, but to restrict access to safe, legal abortion,” said Jill June, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood of the Heartland. “If this bill passes, it could potentially shut down two of the three providers in the state, reducing access to safe, constitutionally protected abortion to women across Oklahoma.”

Female incarceration

The Senate also passed a bill to create a pilot program where the state would pair nonprofits with programs that successfully divert women from prison. Senate Bill 1278, by Sen. Kim David, R-Wagoner, is based on Women in Recovery, a Tulsa program that began in 2009.

“This is a program that is literally a last chance for these women,” David said. “They no longer qualify for drug court or other programs aimed at keeping nonviolent offenders out of prison. But 85 percent of these women have children. We know if we don’t intervene the cycle will just continue.”

Source:  By BARBARA HOBEROCK, World Capitol Bureau | Tulsa World | March 13, 2014 | www.tulsaworld.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.