[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Residents ‘devastated’ after battle against wind turbines is lost  

Credit:  Tenby Observer | 14 March 2014 | www.tenby-today.co.uk ~~

A judicial review challenge against a decision by Pembrokeshire County Council’s planning committee to grant permission for two wind turbines to be built at Princes Gate has been lost.
Objectors mounted the legal challenge last year on two grounds.
They claimed that the officer’s report to the committee was flawed as it did not find the proposal contrary to the Local Development Plan.
They also claimed that the Environmental Impact Assessment Screening Opinion was defective.
However, at the High Court in Cardiff last week, Judge Hickenbottom backed the council’s handling of the application.
Dismissing the first ground, Judge Hickenbottom noted that in assessing the potential impact on the historic environment, the committee report had been prepared with ‘patent care’ and that it weighed and balanced the competing policies within the plan.
He also dismissed the second ground.
In refusing the claim, the Judge made an order of costs in favour of the council and refused the claimants leave to appeal.
Princes Gate Spring Water applied for permission to build two 800kw wind turbines at Middleton Top, near Ludchurch.
The planning committee agreed to the development in May last year on the basis that the benefits in terms of the contribution to the generation of renewable energy outweighed any adverse impacts.


Following the decision, campaigner Mary Sinclair, chairman of the Pembrokeshire branch of CPRW, said that residents were “devastated to lose their long and costly battle” against the turbines
She said homes only 400m from the site would have direct views of the turbines from their living rooms, bedrooms and amenity areas.
“The turbines will dominate residents’ lives,” she stressed.
“Residents have previously supported Princes Gate Spring Water and their investment in renewable energy and requested that they locate their turbines on ground they own, adjacent to their water bottling plant.
“The only response from the planners was to pretend that residents wanted the turbines in the factory car park.”
Dave and Isabel Scourfield, of the Belle Vue Equestrian Centre, were also devastated by the decision, explained Mrs. Sinclair.
“They have tried to habituate their highly strung competition horses to wind turbines, but failed, leaving their horses disturbed and frightened and their riders in danger,” she said.
“Horses from this small centre have previously enjoyed national and international success. As the turbines will overlook their entire holding, and are located only 200m from fields in which they break in and train them, their business is now in jeopardy.
“The developers themselves highlighted the extent of the shadow impact from the blades on Belle Vue fields and explained the special problems that moving shadows on the ground cause to horses. Yet the planning authority has set no condition to protect the centre, nor was any background noise monitoring undertaken there, nor at any other home directly affected by the development.”

Source:  Tenby Observer | 14 March 2014 | www.tenby-today.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.