[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Unfair system  

Credit:  The Scotsman | 11 March 2014 | www.scotsman.com ~~

I have a problem with the planning system. We are told by the Scottish Government that the system is working well but is it?

ABO Wind has submitted its application for an anemometer mast for its proposed wind farm at Kilmorack and Strathglass.

The submission follows a letter that was sent to its three directors in Germany, endorsed by more than 400 individuals and 80 businesses, telling the company that the community would not accept its proposed industrial wind turbine development under any circumstances.

ABO responded but did not seem to grasp the fact that it was not wanted and promptly put its mast application in. Apparently, this application has to be supported or objected to for what it is – a mast – ie not a precursor to a wind farm.

The mast is 80m tall – higher than the Kessock Bridge and nearly as tall as a Fairburn 
turbine.

ABO wishes to plonk it in our community for five years – two years longer than usual mast applications – with no explanation as to why or any visualisations to show impact or assessment of its risk to the very special birds that are regularly seen in this area.

If the mast has to be considered by residents as only a mast then one assumes the planners have to do the same. Anything else would surely be double standards and grossly unfair.

So how could a council possibly approve an application for a dominating, alien structure that has no benefit or purpose in our stunning landscape?

It is certainly not in the national interest and the community has said a very strong “no” to such industrialisation.

Which is more important: the local community and people who live here or ABO – which doesn’t?

Lyndsey Ward

Breakachy

Beauly

Source:  The Scotsman | 11 March 2014 | www.scotsman.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: