[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Unfair system 

Credit:  The Scotsman | 11 March 2014 | www.scotsman.com ~~

I have a problem with the planning system. We are told by the Scottish Government that the system is working well but is it?

ABO Wind has submitted its application for an anemometer mast for its proposed wind farm at Kilmorack and Strathglass.

The submission follows a letter that was sent to its three directors in Germany, endorsed by more than 400 individuals and 80 businesses, telling the company that the community would not accept its proposed industrial wind turbine development under any circumstances.

ABO responded but did not seem to grasp the fact that it was not wanted and promptly put its mast application in. Apparently, this application has to be supported or objected to for what it is – a mast – ie not a precursor to a wind farm.

The mast is 80m tall – higher than the Kessock Bridge and nearly as tall as a Fairburn 

ABO wishes to plonk it in our community for five years – two years longer than usual mast applications – with no explanation as to why or any visualisations to show impact or assessment of its risk to the very special birds that are regularly seen in this area.

If the mast has to be considered by residents as only a mast then one assumes the planners have to do the same. Anything else would surely be double standards and grossly unfair.

So how could a council possibly approve an application for a dominating, alien structure that has no benefit or purpose in our stunning landscape?

It is certainly not in the national interest and the community has said a very strong “no” to such industrialisation.

Which is more important: the local community and people who live here or ABO – which doesn’t?

Lyndsey Ward



Source:  The Scotsman | 11 March 2014 | www.scotsman.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon