LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Analysis: Hawaii avoids storage after $30m fire 

Credit:  6 March 2014 by Ros Davidson | Windpower Monthly | www.windpowermonthly.com ~~

Electricity storage is seen by some as an important requirement for the development of wind power, but it is is still a largely experimental field. This was highlighted by the $30million battery fire that closed First Wind’s Kahuku project in 2012. Although the project reopened in February, the cause of the fire is still unknown.

The fire was so fierce that firefighters could not enter the building for seven hours. It was also the third battery fire at the 30MW wind farm since its opening in March 2011. In fact, Hawaiian Electric Co (Heco), the local utility, and First Wind decided against battery storage for the re-opened project. They instead selected D-VAR, or dynamic volt-amp reactive technology, from AMSC for continuous voltage regulation.

Asked about the decision, Heco’s official response was: “Hawaiian Electric worked with First Wind to evaluate the use of a D-VAR [system] and determined [that] it was a cost-effective solution to regulate voltage for safe, reliable integration of energy from the Kahuku wind farm into the grid.”

Battery storage was initially chosen because of the small island grid. The “chemical capacitor” storage technology digitally smoothed the output to ±1MW per minute by rapidly absorbing or releasing power as needed, said Xtreme Power, the Texas supplier of the pilot 15MW system.

Xtreme, a leading provider of wind-project batteries, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy this January. It had been backed by well-known venture-capital investors, including Dow Chemical Company, Fluor, BP Alternative Energy, Dominion Resources, Posco ICT, Skylake & Co, Spring Ventures, Sail Capital Partners and Bessemer Venture Partners.

A probe of the first two Kahuku fires – in April and May 2011 – blamed manufacturing defects in the capacitors made by Electronic Concepts Inc (ECI) and contained in inverters by Dynapower. This is alleged in a lawsuit against ECI and Dynapower by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, which insured First Wind. According to the November 2013 suit, the design of the Dynapower inverters was also not “sufficiently robust”.

So far, cost is the main barrier to battery storage, said Fort Felker, director of the national wind technology centre at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). An NREL study has found that storage is “very helpful” when wind penetration in a grid exceeds perhaps 50%, he said. But in most situations a larger balancing area, for example, is enough to integrate variable generation sources such as wind.

Milton Holloway, president of the Centre for the Commercialisation of Electric Technologies (CCET), said wind farms backed by storage can respond more quickly to frequency dips than gas-fired plants. Storage can also smooth out daily variations in generation, he added.

The future value of batteries “depends upon how inexpensive they become”, he agreed. “It’s potentially a really important resource for the grid.” Holloway noted the February announcement by Tesla Motors, the electric car maker, of a $5 billion “giga-factory” for lithium-ion batteries for electric utilities as well as for cars. CCET is trialling a 1MW/1MWh lithium-ion based battery storage system with Samsung SDI, part of Samsung Group, and Xtreme at the Reese Technology Centre in Texas for a wind integration project.

Source:  6 March 2014 by Ros Davidson | Windpower Monthly | www.windpowermonthly.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky