[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Scenic resources  

Credit:  Bangor Daily News | Posted March 04, 2014 | bangordailynews.com ~~

In a Feb 28 BDN OpEd, Paul Williamson extolled “Maine’s obligation to wind power.” He got one thing right: “Wind energy is highly visible.” And that is precisely why inland wind power is not a good investment for Maine.

Maine has an equal obligation to its scenic resources. According to a Maine State Planning Office report from 2006, Maine’s largest industry is tourism, generating 140,000 jobs and over $10 billion in sales of goods and services. Sightseeing is the largest attraction for visitors, far exceeding the national average. Tourists come for our wilderness-like areas, large fishing lakes and scenic byways, including the Appalachian Trail.

In 2006 the state commissioned the Brookings Institution to create an action plan for promoting Maine’s sustainable prosperity and quality places. In “Charting Maine’s Future,” the authors noted: “As the search for quality places grows in importance, Maine possesses a globally known ‘brand’ built on images of livable communities, stunning scenery, and great recreational opportunities.”

Just two years later, driven by special-interest politics, the 2008 Wind Energy Act created expedited permitting of grid-scale wind projects. Wind turbines, more than 500-feet tall, began affecting viewsheds and scenic resources and creating irreparable environmental changes as rural landscapes were cleared for turbine platforms, access roads and transmission line upgrades to reach distant population centers.

Which vision produces real economic benefit for Maine: acres of wind turbines producing renewable energy credits for urban centers in southern New England or Maine’s special “brand” of scenic resources? The choice seems pretty clear to me.

Donald E. Moore


Source:  Bangor Daily News | Posted March 04, 2014 | bangordailynews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.