LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Groton Wind experience has shown that Iberdrola can’t be trusted 

Credit:  The Laconia Daily Sun | 28 February 2014 | www.laconiadailysun.com ~~

To The Daily Sun,

In May 2011, the Spanish company, Iberdrola Renewables, was granted a permit by the New Hampshire Site Evaluation Committee (SEC) for a 48 megawatt, 24 turbine wind farm on the mountain ridges in the town of Groton. Groton Wind was built and went on line in December 2012. After 14 months of operation, Groton Wind is being investigated by the State Attorney General’s Office and the State Fire Marshal’s Office. The wind farm operation has been given a notice of possible suspension of certificate of site and facility.

The complaints against Groton Wind include: relocating two wind turbine towers from their approved locations, relocating a “Walmart sized” maintenance building from its approved (less visible) location, relocating 1,000 feet of access road with greater wetlands impact, relocating 600 feet of an existing road that was agreed to not be changed and not redoing required studies to take into account the revised height of the towers. In response to these charges Iberdrola claims the changes are minor.

In response to the Fire Marshal’s complaint of not receiving notification of proposed changes and not receiving plans for approval, Iberdrola claims the Fire Marshal has no jurisdiction. In response to the Fire Marshal’s request for fire suppression systems on the turbine towers Iberdrola claims they met the minimum requirements required by the fire code.

On Dec 12, 2013, Iberdrole Renewables filed an application for a 75.9 megawatt, 23 turbine wind farm on the mountain ridges in view of Cardigan Mountain and overlooking scenic Newfound Lake in the towns of Alexandria and Danbury. On Jan. 13 of this year the State Site Evaluation Committee (SEC) determined the application for the Wild Meadows wind farm to be incomplete and gave Iberdrola 10 days to provide additional information. The SEC indicated that the application was “a hurriedly assembled document intended to beat the deadline imposed by a tax credit that ended at the end of the year.” The application was missing required wildlife studies, had incomplete description of business relationships and had inadequate information on water, fire and historical resources. Iberdrola was unable to provide the required information within the 10 day deadline and must now submit a new application for the project.

Iberdrola has announced that they are putting the Wild Meadows project on on hold to concentrate on resolving the issues at Groton Wind. Wild Meadows shouldn’t just be put on hold. The project should be canceled.

From the very beginning Iberdrola claimed they would not build Wild Meadows without local support. But last year residents in Alexandria, Grafton and Bridgewater passed warrant articles – all by a 2-1 margin or more – either opposing new wind farms in the area or demanding that companies post security bonds for removing wind power facilities when their life is complete.

Danbury’s 790 residents were balloted and voted against Wild Meadows 249-116. Iberdrola’s response was, “We don’t think the low level of responses provides an accurate reflection of local sentiment.”

It is obvious that Iberdrola cannot be trusted. Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me.

Art Cote
Plymouth

Source:  The Laconia Daily Sun | 28 February 2014 | www.laconiadailysun.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky