Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Council on collision course with government over wind farms
Credit: Westmeath Examiner | 25th February 2014 | www.westmeathexaminer.ie ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Westmeath County Council could be on a collision course with the Government after a number of represenatives vowed that they are “not for changing” when it comes to the controversial issue of windfarms.
On February 17, Minister for Planning Jan O’Sullivan notified the council that there were four planning issues relating to the latest County Development Plan, two of which were part of the Mullingar Area Plan. The most significant of the objections in terms of the number of public submissions received, concerned the policy requiring industrial wind turbines to have a set back distance from residential areas of ten times their height.
The Government has asked the council to review the policy as it is inconsistent with existing planning legislation.
While at yesterday’s monthly council meeting members agreed to wait until after the new deadline for public submissions had elapsed before deciding what its course of action will be, a number of councillors noted that they were “not for changing”.
“Three thousand people have made submissions. They have made their mind up and I hope that double that number make submissions this time around,” said Cllr Ken Glynn.
Speaking to the Westmeath Examiner, Cllr Glynn said that Westmeath County Council should not be “dictated to” by central government.
“I am not for changing. We went through the whole process. We listened to what people had to say. Over 3,000 submissions were made and it was very clear what the issues were. The fact is that the people are happy with what we put forward.”
Cllr Johnny Penrose, who made the original proposal relating to set back distances, also noted that he would not be changing his position.
Cathaoirleach Peter Burke, who was at pains to stress that the council’s policy restricting wind turbines to cutover and cutaway bogs was “100 percent accepted”, welcomed Cllr Mark Cooney’s proposal that the council wait until after the March 12 deadline for public submission before reviewing their position. “Let the people have their say,” he said.
Cllr Ger Corcoran noted that the public’s concerns regarding the development of windfarms are “very real” and “growing”. He also predicted that the volume of public submissions will be even greater this time around.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: