[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Supreme Court lets stand FERC ruling on tariff for renewable transmission lines  

Credit:  Jeremy P. Jacobs, E&E reporter • Posted: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 via www.governorswindenergycoalition.org ~~

The Supreme Court today declined to review the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s approval of a tariff system for the cost of new transmission lines for renewable sources in the Midwest.

The Midcontinent Independent System Operator, or MISO, in 2010 asked FERC to approve tariffs to upgrade and install transmission lines for connecting renewable energy sources called “multi value projects,” or MVPs, to the existing grid.

MISO was seeking to link wind farms in the Great Plains to the rest of its system, and it allocated the cost of the lines to all utilities drawing power from its system according to the amount of energy used. So, urban centers were charged more than rural areas.

Michigan and several utilities challenged that structure in court, arguing that the upgrade costs should be proportional to the benefits its consumers will receive.

The state claims that it gets the vast majority of its power from neighboring grid operators and that the new transmission lines won’t benefit the state, so it shouldn’t have to pay for the upgrades.

Michigan and utilities in Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin asked the Supreme Court to take up the case.

“In its apparent zeal to promote renewable energy,” the Indiana-based Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative wrote in its petition, “FERC approved a novel ratemaking scheme that imposes billions of dollars in transmission project costs on customers in over a dozen states without regard to the actual costs caused or benefits received by those customers.”

The Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld FERC’s approval of the plan, ruling that the upgrades improve overall grid reliability and therefore benefit the entire system.

By declining to take up the case, the justices left that ruling in place.

Source:  Jeremy P. Jacobs, E&E reporter • Posted: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 via www.governorswindenergycoalition.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: