Please take a minute to help keep us online.
To preserve our independence, we are not funded by any political or industry groups, and we do not host ads. Wind Watch relies entirely on user donations, every penny of which goes directly to keeping the web site running.
Stripe:  |
PayPal/Venmo:  |
Alberta Utilities Commission approves large wind power project; MD of Provost had refused development permits for it
Credit: By Sheila Pratt, Edmonton Journal | February 20, 2014 | www.edmontonjournal.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
EDMONTON – The Alberta Utilities Commission gave the green light Thursday to a large wind power project in the Municipal District of Provost which had previously refused to approve development permits for it.
The AUC overruled the MD and approved the Bull Creek project by BluEarth Renewables with 46 wind towers, 27 of which are in the MD of Provost. The rest will be built in the adjacent Municipal District of Wainwright which had approved the development.
The $240 million project will be generate about 100 megawatts of electricity.
The MD of Provost had turned down the development because it did not fit with existing land uses and there was considerable opposition. The area is already used for farming and ranching and there is considerable oil and gas activity.
The commission dismissed residents’ concerns about noise and environmental concerns about migratory birds, noting that the Alberta environment department had “signed off” on the project.
“The Commission finds that the negative effects of the project, which include visual impacts, noise, annoyance, and impacts to the environment can be mitigated to an acceptable degree,” says the decision.
The project will also provide “some economic benefit to the community” and contribute to the development of the electricity grid.
“The commission is also satisfied any safety concerns about the project in proximity to oil and gas pipelines can be effectively mitigated,” says the decision.
The commission took into account the opposition of the MD of Provost but also “letters of support” for the project, says the decision. Residents worried about noise and sleep disruption also raised concerns about potential harm to “a global migratory bird route” through the area and a high risk of bat fatalities.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=61650 ]
