LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Democracy denied 

Credit:  Sun Journal | February 17, 2014 | www.sunjournal.com ~~

“Emergency legislation” proposed by Senate President Justin Alfond, in the form of LD 1750, falls into the “you can’t make these things up” category. It would be comical, if it were not bold evidence of special interests walking the halls in Augusta.

What’s the crisis? Well, after countless reviews, First Wind’s Bowers Mountain and Passadumkeag wind projects have been turned down, by public opinion, and by every Maine state agency. So now, Alfond wants to change the permitting process for wind power projects.

The text of this bill has the wind lobby’s fingerprints all over it, and it would set a dangerous precedent.

LD 1750 would eliminate the provisions in the Wind Energy Act that allowed the DEP to deny permits. The bill would make it illegal for Maine state agencies to consider public opinion, and public testimony, when making licensing decisions. The only opinions allowed will be those of “qualified experts” – which translates, simply, into paid, pro-wind experts – the hired guns only the wind lobby can afford.

People who value democracy, even those who are in favor of wind development, have to be opposed to LD 1750.

I can only hope that Maine citizens will recognize this bill for what it is and make their voices heard.

Jack Gagnon, Lakeville

[Sun Journal Editor’s] note: LD 1750 does not expressly exclude non-expert public testimony, but adds language that agency decisions must be based on the best evidence available to the agency, “including the conclusions and testimony of qualified experts.” Some people have expressed worry that the bill fails to define “qualified experts” and that, if the bill passes, opposition testimony from laymen and abutters will no longer be considered. The public hearing on this bill is scheduled for 1 p.m. on Tuesday, Feb. 18, before the Committee on Energy, Utilities and Technology.

Source:  Sun Journal | February 17, 2014 | www.sunjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon