[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Dear Council Members  

Credit:  The Block Island Times | Letters to the Editor, February 15, 2014 | Feb 17, 2014 | block-island.villagesoup.com/ ~~

This letter was sent to the members of the Coastal Resources Management Council and copied to The Block Island Times.

My name is Mary Jane Balser. I am a year-round resident of Block Island. I am a former member of the Town Council for New Shoreham (Block Island) and former Finance Director for the Town government. I have built a 20-unit affordable housing development on the Island. Most importantly, I own and operate the Block Island Grocery. My business is one of the largest, if not the largest, commercial consumers of electricity on the Island. Additionally, my business is one of the largest retail businesses on the Island.

I am profoundly against the Deepwater Block Island project. I have studied the need for an alternate source of power to our island for many years. In fact, I was responsible for a series of federal and state grant submissions to provide financing for a submarine cable to the Island.

I do not understand how any member of the Rhode Island government (whether executive, legislative, judicial or regulatory) could support such a fiscally irresponsible project as the Deepwater Block Island project. If permitted, this project will cost me and every other ratepayer in Rhode Island over $500 million in costs in excess of market costs for power. National Grid, in response to requests for information from the R.I. Public Utilities Commission (PUC) requests, has routinely estimated this excess cost over the past three years to be between $400 million and $550 million above market cost. Regardless of what you may be told by Deepwater or its proponents, I do not believe that my business will ever benefit from this project if allowed to proceed with these costs to the public, even on Block Island.

The only way to secure less expensive and more reliable power for us on the Island is through a stand-alone cable. For over 20 years, I have worked to get the state to socialize a cable to the island for far far less than this project will cost. Today, a stand-alone cable would cost only 20 percent of the cost of the Deepwater Block Island project and cable and we could all buy “green power” from existing options offered by National Grid and its affiliates for much less per kWh than Deepwater will ever offer.

Most importantly, I believe my business will suffer from the dramatic impact this power plant will have on the unique environmental qualities of Block Island. It is a destination for all looking to enjoy serenity and nature. Just this week, The Block Island Times published its annual Block Island Weddings magazine targeting engaged couples and their wedding planners to consider Block Island for their weddings. In fact, on the cover of the magazine, there is a U.S. Marine and his newlywed bride pictured set off of Paynes Lookout with the SE Lighthouse, Mohegan Bluffs and Atlantic Ocean in the background. That setting will never be available for the next 20 years because five 600-foot turbines will be very highly visible as well. No bride will ever want that in her wedding picture. No one can argue that the loss of this viewshed will not harm my business and any other on the Island.

Please deny Deepwater’s application for this project.

Mary Jane Balser

Southwest Point Rd.

Source:  The Block Island Times | Letters to the Editor, February 15, 2014 | Feb 17, 2014 | block-island.villagesoup.com/

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch