[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Fraser: Holyrood must resist windfarm pressure over Scots landscape  

Credit:  Cameron Brooks, 4th February 2014 | www.energyvoice.com ~~

The Scottish Government has been urged not to “bow to pressure” from energy companies who are opposed to proposals to ban windfarms from wild lands.

Conservative energy spokesman Murdo Fraser said organisations such as Scottish Power, SSE and Scottish Renewables had made it clear they did not want areas of wild land being designated turbine-free zones and were not in favour of plans to stop developments being built within 1.9miles of villages and towns.

In a written statement to Holyrood’s energy committee, Scottish Power said: “We view the proposals for a separation distance of 1.9 miles between settlements and windfarms, and a perceived presumption against onshore windfarms in core areas of wild land, as disproportionate.”

SSE suggested the proposals could “seriously undermine and jeopardise” energy firms’ ability to meet the government’s policy objectives and claimed the changes were not “necessary or justified”.

By contrast, environmental charity the John Muir Trust and Scottish Environment Link have told MSPs the proposed planning measures do not go far enough.

Mr Fraser, committee convener, said: “There is a clear contrast in views between those who want to protect the environment and countryside, and those who stand to make vast amounts of money from windfarm development.

“The Scottish Government should be coming down on the side of Scotland’s landscape – it cannot now bow to pressure from those with such a blatant vested interest.”

Source:  Cameron Brooks, 4th February 2014 | www.energyvoice.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: