LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind power a bad value, kills birds 

Credit:  Casper Star-Tribune Online | February 3, 2014 | trib.com ~~

In response to Ms. Propst’s Jan. 26 letter on the wind industry, “Wind power causes only a tiny fraction of bird deaths,” repeat for the umpteenth time: Turbines kill raptors and bats. Few other human or feline activities do that—and ones that do are fined large amounts. Wind pretends killing birds is no big deal. Yet oil, gas, even landfills get fined for killing migratory birds and raptors. That says “big deal.” So either drop all fines, call it all “no big deal” for everyone or fine wind and stop pretending it’s somehow okay for the wind industry to chop up eagles and explode bats.

As for the “accomplishments” of European wind, Denmark, Ireland and Portugal use less than one half the electricity per capita as the United States. If they matched our per capita usage, then on average their wind would provide 15 percent of their energy (currently it averages under 30 percent –those figures Ms. Propst listed were for very, very short periods and ignored times when no energy was produced). Denmark pays an average costs per kilowatt-hour of 41 cents. The US average is 12 cents, according to 2011 figures. Wind is apparently a very expensive “free energy” source.

Ms Propst said “at times” Portugal has “reliably obtained” such power. That statement is an oxymoron. Her whole sales pitch sum up to: “Mrs. Smith, I have a great car for you. It’s three times as expensive as the others, will at times reliably get you to work and back and at times reliably get 60 miles per gallon (downhill with a tailwind).”

SHERI KIMBROUGH, Evansville

Source:  Casper Star-Tribune Online | February 3, 2014 | trib.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky