[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

House vote on wind moratorium based on geography, not politics 

Credit:  By DAN SEUFERT, Union Leader Correspondent | February 02, 2014 | www.unionleader.com ~~

BRISTOL – The vote last week on a House bill that would have imposed a moratorium on new wind turbine and electric transmission projects was defeated along partisan lines, with most Republicans supporting the moratorium and Democrats opposing it.

Supporters and opponents of the bill say the vote may have looked like it was along party lines, but it was more about geography.House Bill 580 would have imposed a moratorium while studies are completed to develop a state energy strategy and to review the state’s energy plant siting process.
The vote to kill the bill was 194-148, with 121 Republicans voting for the moratorium while 33 voted against. Among Democrats, the vote was 27 for the moratorium and 160 opposed; one independent also opposed the moratorium.

Rep. Robert Backus, D-Manchester, a chief opponent of the bill, said he wasn’t surprised at the vote, and said it wasn’t a matter of political ideology.

“No, it was about people voting for new energy projects that our state needs,” Backus said Friday.

The sponsor of the bill, Rep. Harold Reilly of Bristol, agreed with his opponent.
“I can’t really say it was a Democrat-Republican fight because many members of the other party came over to my side and voted with me,” Reilly said. “It shouldn’t really be a Democrat-Republican issue anyway, this is about representing the people.”

State Sen. Jeanie Forrester, R-District 2, who has supported proposals for moratoriums, said opponents of new wind power projects were not represented by either party over the other in the vote.
“Even with the vote numbers, I guess you still have to say it’s not a partisan issue,” Forrester said. “If you look at the numbers in terms of geography, areas where there has been a lot of activity (by wind power developers) were for the moratorium.”
New Hampshire Wind Watch, a group opposing new wind power developments in the Newfound Lake-Cardigan Mountain area, said that the moratorium vote in Grafton County, where there are proposals for new wind farms, was 13-9 in favor of the moratorium.

Source:  By DAN SEUFERT, Union Leader Correspondent | February 02, 2014 | www.unionleader.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky