[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lowell to revisit anti-wind article at Town Meeting 

Credit:  BETH GARBITELLI, Associated Press | 01/22/2014 | www.benningtonbanner.com ~~

The Lowell select board is expected to add an anti-wind power article to its March Town Meeting Day agenda after the Vermont Supreme Court ordered it to reconsider an item that was first was passed over at the meeting almost three years ago, officials said Tuesday.

Select Board Chair Richard Pion said he wished the town had considered the article in 2010 when it first went before the town.

“I expect they will either pass it over or defeat it,” Pion said. “It makes no difference how people vote, there’s nothing to become of it.”

The 21 turbines of the Kingdom Community Wind project are producing electricity, and the taxes paid by Green Mountain Power are supplementing the town budget.

“Last year, this wind money paid everybody’s municipal tax,” Pion said.

But Lowell resident Ed Wesolow, who took the issue to the Vermont Supreme Court, said the ruling Friday was a win for Democracy, because the court ruled the town must consider the issue.

“I was hoping they’d do the honorable thing and do what they should have done in the first place,” which is hold a special town meeting. “All this is, is asking the minority to have a voice to express the fact that we don’t like the tactics that have taken place or the ramifications that will hurt this town in the long run.”

Lowell is home to Green Mountain Power’s Kingdom Community Wind project. In 2010, before it was built, 75 percent of residents at Town Meeting Day voted in favor of the project. The Lowell wind project generated fierce opposition from opponents who felt it would scar the ridgeline and provide no environmental benefit.

In 2010, Wesolow and others petitioned to place an anti-wind article on the Town Meeting Day agenda. The proposed article accused the wind project of violating private property rights, destroying stream headwaters and depressing real estate values.

The article was tabled at the meeting by a majority vote before any discussion could occur and later requests for a special meeting to re-address the article were dismissed by the town.

But Wesolow and the others took the issue to court. A Superior Court judge ruled the town should reconsider the issue. The town appealed, but on Friday, the Vermont Supreme Court sided with Wesolow.

GMP spokeswoman Dorothy Schnure said that before the project was built the company held numerous meetings and information sessions for the residents of Lowell, but none have been held for the town since then.

“We did everything we could to give information about the project,” said Schnure.

Schnure cited lack of interest and the availability for tours of the operational project to explain the lack of recent meetings about the project for Lowell residents.

“There was a very tiny vocal opposition that was behind this article,” Schnure said.

“I applaud Ed Wesolow’s effort to have a fair and open process,” said Steve Wright, a former commissioner of the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department who has been active in the fight against the Kingdom Community Wind project. “Any effort to increase the debate and the debate around effective climate change action is entirely appropriate, not only appropriate, but necessary.

“Those towers will be memorials to bad decision making,” Wright said of the turbines. “They already are.”

Source:  BETH GARBITELLI, Associated Press | 01/22/2014 | www.benningtonbanner.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky