[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Just not worth it  

Credit:  Caledonian Record Editorial: 1/20/2014 ~~

Essex County landowner Dan Ouimette closed his land last week, following an anti-wind vote in the United Towns and Gores that may halt any industrial wind development there. Ouimette owns thousands of acres, some of which he leased to the Seneca Mountain Wind project to host wind turbines. After property owners voted against the proposed development, Ouimette posted his land – effectively closing it to snowmobilers, hunters, hikers, etc.

A number of people are upset – including Ouimette. Wind opponents and snowmobilers accuse Ouimette, essentially, of taking his ball and going home. But Ouimette counters that the battle over wind has left his property vandalized and his peace of mind shattered.

For our part we lament the entire fight. On one hand we believe firmly in the rights of property owners and support Ouimette in his efforts first to develop, and later to close, his land. It disgusts us that people might resort to vandalism and don’t blame him for his decision, in light of his experience.

On the other hand wind development is the ultimate zoning issue. Just take a look at developments in Lowell and Sheffield. They consume the viewshed far beyond your typical development projects. It’s one of the few arenas that we believe should warrant a voice from surrounding communities.

The worst part about all of this is that communities are being torn apart by bad public policy, big government subsidies and a misguided pursuit of “green energy.”

Wind is a cash cow for developers – earning tax credits, naked subsidies, and guaranteed (fixed) consumption by ratepayers.

But wind projects distort energy markets and require such intensive energy to develop that nobody believes them to actually be “green.”

To those problems we would add a few more.

1) Vermont already has more electricity than it can use.

2) Most of the state’s carbon footprint derives from vehicles and heating our homes in winter. As such, expensive and inefficient wind projects yield no meaningful effect on aggregate carbon emissions.

3) Wind energy is notoriously intermittent and unreliable, requiring fossil-fuel powered backup plants when the wind doesn’t blow.

4) Because of well-known and understood transmission and infrastructure limitations, the New England grid operator has to limit the amount of power it can absorb from Vermont’s boutique projects. ISO New England is maxed out and has no plans to increase grid capacity to accommodate Shumlin’s oddball schemes.

5) The governor’s grand plan – calling for 90 percent renewable energy by 2050 – is not only unachievable, it will also bankrupt rate and taxpayers.

6) The science behind Shumlin’s “global warming” fanaticism is, at best, unresolved.

So despite all the lofty talk of saving the world from global warming, these renewable energy projects have always been about the money. Throw up a bunch of renewable energy projects, hustle the tax credits and subsidies, and charge ratepayers exorbitant fees for intermittent power. Communities and mountains be damned.

These projects were well-understood to be a bad fit for Vermont’s climate, make no sense economically and yield zero impact on net carbon footprint. Worse is that they are tearing far too many people apart and bringing out the worst in everyone.

Source:  Caledonian Record Editorial: 1/20/2014

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.