LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Trawden turbine proposals spark debate 

Credit:  by Rebecca Cohen | Filey & Hunmanby Mercury | /www.fileymercury.co.uk ~~

A total of 17 wind turbines for Colne and its surrounding villages have been submitted to Pendle Council over the past two years.

Four of the proposals were approved, seven were withdrawn and six were refused.

And now, with proposed plans for Buttock Laithe Farm, in Coal Pit Lane, Trawden, being re-submitted, yet more debate about wind power has been sparked within the local community.

The application, if given the green light, would consist of a 50kw turbine, foundations and a control unit. The turbine would have a hub height of 36.6m and an overall height of 48.6m.

For some the application has revived a number of fears, while for others it is a way of creating opportunities.

Chris Taylor (67), of Cotton Tree Lane, is against turbines for various reasons, including the fact they could lead to a rise in energy bills, leave a blight on the landscape and his belief that one application could turn into “dozens”.

Talking about the latest plans, he said: “Turbines may be in the interest of the government and revenue, but they are not in the interest of residents.

“One turbine will lead to dozens. But even if residents object, and it gets turned down, it doesn’t stop anybody else from putting in an application.

“My view is that turbines are another tool for exploiting people, not just in Pendle, but throughout the rest of the country as well.”

Another local resident, Martin Creek, of Gladstone Terrace, added: “We hadn’t been notified about the application until Sunday. As residents, we are going to have to be looking at it if it is successful – we are hoping we can do everything to stop it.”

One resident less concerned about the latest proposals, but still fearful over the issue is Brian Jackson from Friends of the Earth. He said: “If there was a lot of turbines I would be worried. But farmers need to make a living somehow.

“We need to keep our eye on the situation, so that it doesn’t spiral out of control. We don’t want it turning into a major windfarm project.”

But for Jon Roche, site finder for DC21 Group Ltd, small scale wind turbines are a way of guaranteeing local energy security, providing employment and putting money into the pockets of local landowners. He would much rather see turbines installed in the local area than fracking rigs or huge power stations, and reassured residents that there are no plans for a Pendle windfarm.

Mr Roche, who lives opposite the proposed site in Bankfield Street, said: “We need to budget around £300,000 for any turbine – which includes a deconstruction cost for 25 years down the road. By any stretch of the imagination, these are temporary structures. There has been a lot of scaremongering and we need to be calm and reasonable.

“Every application we have put in has been refused, apart from one in Blackburn, and in the last 30 appeals, we have lost only one. If this gets refused, we will be appealing.”

Responding to the feedback from the Buttock Laithe Farm proposals, Leader of Pendle Council Coun. Joe Cooney said that each wind turbine application is considered “very very carefully” by the council. He said: “We are not against wind turbines, but they have got to be in the right location, be the right size, and they have got to have some community benefit.

“What we don’t want is huge, big blights on our countryside.”

Source:  by Rebecca Cohen | Filey & Hunmanby Mercury | /www.fileymercury.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky