[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Fight against Rossie wind turbines  

Credit:  Montrose Review | 14 January 2014 | www.montrosereview.co.uk ~~

Angry local people are once again fighting to stop wind turbines being built near their homes.

A number of objections have already been submitted following an application for three 80 metre turbines to be built 900 metres to the west of Rossie School.

The application was submitted by Tellus Energy Ltd in conjunction with the landowner John Stirling.

In 2007, campaigners formed STORM (Stop Turbines On Rossie Moor) and fought against three 105 metre high turbines. The application was refused and went to an appeal, and after a public inquiry, it was refused by the Scottish Government in 2009.

Now, STORM II has been launched to fight the new application.

Margaret Balfour said: “This application is an insult to the community which fought so hard – and successfully – to defeat the previous one.”

Victoria Stead said: “I am absolutely disgusted that an application has been put forward for these large unsightly wind turbines.”

Virginia Fraser, whose farm is nearby the site, said: “We now seem to be back at square one. The same landowners have registered a new application for three slightly smaller turbines, this time even closer to the moor and straddling an important public footpath regularly used by riders, walkers and birdwatchers.”

She explained it is the only unfenced path across Rossie Moor and would be closed for up to seven months during construction.

Ms Fraser added: “Rossie Moor is a quiet corner of wilderness, rare in this county, which must be defended.”

“Construction traffic would use the road from the A92 at Lunan Smithy, passing very close to several homes, and is estimated to include 254 loads of aggregate, 71 of concrete, and 15 arctics with turbine components,” she concluded.

Landowner John Stirling said: “I strongly support this application and believe even in the last application a majority of people were in favour.

“I believe given the changes made to this application that the site is suitable and will help demonstrate that Angus is a committed supporter of renewable energy.”

Glen Moon, project manager for Green Cat Renewables, who carried out the environmental assessment, said: “The site we have chosen is the best to minimise the visual damage.

“The turbines are not just 80 metre monuments, they’re practical things. They would power 1,400 homes in the UK and would bring in between £5,000 to £10,000 into the local community.

“I would encourage anyone who is opposed to turbines to go and see some up close. They might be surprised that the sound and visual impact isn’t as bad as they might think.”

Written objections have to be in by April 8.

Source:  Montrose Review | 14 January 2014 | www.montrosereview.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.