[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

NY appeals court holds that municipalities are treated no differently from private parties with respect to contractual obligations such as settlement agreements (in wind case)  

Credit:  Posted by: Patricia Salkin | Law of the Land | January 12, 2014 | lawoftheland.wordpress.com ~~

Ecogen Wind LLC and Ecogen Transmission Corp made a motion to the NY Supreme Court to enforce a stipulation of settlement from protracted litigation previously reported on this blog. The Town cross-moved to vacate the settlement on the grounds that, the settlement agreement was illegal and constituted “a gratuitous and invalid act to grant petitioners ‘vested rights’ where the Town Board had no authority to do so.” Ecogen Wind LLC and Ecogen Transmission Corp moved to dismiss the Town’s declaratory judgment action, which the Supreme Court granted in part, but concluded that petitioners had not obtained vested rights in a traditional sense because no substantial changes or improvements had been made to the real property. The trial court further held that petitioners were prevented for 168 days from making such improvements because the Town Board could have approved and reached a Road Agreement with petitioners within that time and before the moratorium was enacted. Accordingly, the court gave petitioners 168 days in which to make such improvements and obtain vested rights, denied the Town’s cross motion to vacate the settlement agreement, and denied petitioners’ motion to dismiss the declaratory judgment action.

On appeal, the Appellate Court found the lower court should have granted in its entirety petitioners’ motion to enforce the settlement agreement, since stipulations of settlement are favored by the courts and not lightly cast aside. The Court reminded that a party will be relieved from the consequences of a stipulation made during litigation only where there is cause sufficient to invalidate a contract, such as fraud, collusion, mistake or accident. Because municipalities are treated no differently from private parties with respect to contractual obligations, such as settlement agreements, this court upheld the settlement agreement in question.

Ecogen Wind LLC v. Town of Prattsburgh Town Bd., 859, 2013 WL 6823368 (N.Y. A.D. 4 Dept. 12/27/2013)

The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.nycourts.gov/courts/ad4/clerk/decisions/2013/12-27-13/PDF/0859.pdf

Source:  Posted by: Patricia Salkin | Law of the Land | January 12, 2014 | lawoftheland.wordpress.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter