LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

No periodic Kingston turbine acoustic reports 

Credit:  By Kathryn Gallerani | Wicked Local Kingston | Posted Jan 12, 2014 | www.wickedlocal.com ~~

KINGSTON – No results will be released until the acoustical study of the Independence wind turbine has been completed, local health officials say.

Despite requests from residents, Board of Health Chairman Joe Casna said last Monday night that the company conducting the testing will not release periodic reports about the results of the study. The town is informed, however, of the dates the testing will take place.

“That’s not the way the scope is designed,” Casna said. “That’s not the way it’s going to happen.”

Once the sound study has been completed, the results will be reviewed by the state Department of Environmental Protection. The study is expected to be completed by the end of February.

Board of Health member Jack Breen said the scope was designed that way for a reason.

“I think they want to do the study and don’t want interference,” he said. “We can critique the study at the end.”

Board members said they received conflicting information about whether Marion Drive turbine owner Mary O’Donnell would shut down her turbines during the study.

Tuesday, O’Donnell said she notified DEP that she will accommodate the study in any way she can. She said she would agree to turn the turbines off during nighttime testing at DEP’s request.

Breen said that he hoped O’ Donnell would agree to shut down the turbines during testing so that the study could produce the most accurate results but noted that No Fossil Fuel is not required to cooperate.

Joanne Levesque, of Duxbury, said she’s concerned the results won’t be consistent let alone accurate.

She argued that sound readings were taken the night of Dec. 13 in the Scofield Road, Leland Road and Prospect Street area while O’Donnell’s turbines were in operation, which she believes should not have happened, but the board has been told the O’Donnell turbines will be shut off when testing is done in the Copper Beech Drive and Country Club Way area.

She also continued to voice her opposition to the Board of Health hiring K2 Management to review flicker study results, although the Finance Committee has approved the expenditure of up to $10,000 for this purpose.

K2 Management is a wind industry consultant and project manager based in Denmark but with an office in Boston. She said the board seems confused about the purpose behind the hiring of the company.

The board plans to meet with K2 Management once town counsel has approved the contract with the company.

Casna reported on the meeting at which the Finance Committee voted to approve the funding. He took issue with another board member, Toni Cushman, appearing at that meeting to give a minority opinion regarding approving funding. He argued that the board should present a united front and that only the chairman as the board’s representative should speak to the request.

Cushman, sitting next to Casna, chose not to respond to his criticism.

Source:  By Kathryn Gallerani | Wicked Local Kingston | Posted Jan 12, 2014 | www.wickedlocal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky