Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Preservation group asks for delay before wind farm approval
Credit: By Rik Stevens | The Associated Press | January 11, 2014 | www.pressherald.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
A forest preservation group on Friday asked New Hampshire to put the brakes on its review of a wind turbine proposal until new siting guidelines are completed.
The Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests filed a motion asking the state’s Site Evaluation Committee to suspend its review of the Wild Meadows project. The society told The Associated Press the review should wait while the state’s Site Evaluation Committee regulations are being revised.
“Now is not the time to push through an important project,” said Jack Savage, a spokesman for the society. “It’s time to step back, wait for the process to be fixed and then move forward. We’re not objecting to the project itself.”
Wild Meadows is a project of energy giant Iberdrola Renewables, which also operates a similar wind farm in Lempster and is bringing a 24-unit farm online in Groton. Wild Meadows calls for 23 turbines, each 492 feet tall, in Danbury and Alexandria. State officials look at such projects as important steps toward generating 25 percent of the state’s energy from renewable sources by 2025.
Iberdrola filed its application for a Site Evaluation Committee certificate last month.
Calls seeking comment from the SEC and Iberdrola were not immediately returned Friday afternoon.
When the project was first proposed near the end of 2012, company officials said most of the turbines will be at least four miles away from Newfound Lake and not visible to most people in that area. They said a three-year study done by Iberdrola under the direction of the state Fish and Game Department found no special or unique habitats on the proposed turbine site, and that the turbines themselves would not pose a threat to migratory birds.
Last year, the New Hampshire legislature ordered the state’s Office of Energy and Planning to review the SEC’s siting process, which had been criticized as outdated.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: