LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm test case ‘could see hundreds of turbines near historic sites’ 

Credit:  By Ben Farmer | The Telegram | 03 Jan 2014 | www.telegraph.co.uk ~~

A wind farm company is bringing a legal test case expected to set a precedent on how much protection stately homes and historic sites have from people wanting to build turbines.

The wife of Ed Miliband, the Labour leader, is representing the company in the case that could lead to hundreds of turbines being built close to heritage sites.

Justine Thornton, a barrister specialising in environmental law, is advising Barnwell Manor Wind Energy, which wants to build four 400ft-high turbines on land in Northamptonshire belonging to the Duke of Gloucester, the Queen’s cousin.

The case is being watched closely by the wind-power industry and is expected to set a precedent on how much protection heritage sites have from turbines, The Times reported.

The case, to be heard at the Court of Appeal on January 23, is against the National Trust, English Heritage and East Northamptonshire Council, which jointly won a landmark High Court ruling against the turbines last year.

The farm would overshadow Lyveden New Bield, a Grade I-listed, unfinished Elizabethan lodge and moated garden, the trust has warned. The turbines would be erected less than a mile away.

Simon Thurley, chief executive of English Heritage, has said the effect on the site would be “appalling”.

However, an appeal prepared by Ms Thornton and Gordon Nardell, QC, argues the High Court was wrong to overrule a planning inspector’s decision in favour of the wind farm.

Paul Griffiths, the inspector, has been nicknamed “Inspector Blight” by campaigners against wind farms after approving turbines in 19 of the 22 cases he has heard since May 2009, overturning decisions made by local councillors.

The Duke of Gloucester’s estate could make £120,000 a year in rental fees from the turbines, the newspaper reported.

Source:  By Ben Farmer | The Telegram | 03 Jan 2014 | www.telegraph.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky