[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Environmental Review Tribunal rules in favour of Dufferin Wind Power  

Credit:  ER Tribunal rules in favour of DWP | Written By WES KELLER | Orangeville Citizen | 2014-01-02 | www.citizen.on.ca ~~

The Environmental Review Tribunal has upheld ministerial approvals of the 100-megawatt Dufferin Wind Power (DWP) wind farm in Melancthon.

The approvals include not only the turbines but also the 230 kv transmission line along the rail corridor. DWP also has Ontario Energy Board “leave to construct” the power line but lacks agreement with Dufferin County and other property owners for necessary easements, and is seeking permission tennis · squash to expropriate.

In upholding environmental approvals, the tribunal essentially rejected claims of adverse effects on human and animal health and of irreparable damage to the environment.

“The Tribunal finds that the Appellants have not established that engaging in the Project as approved will cause seri- ous and irreversible harm to plant life, animal life or the natural environment.

“The Tribunal finds that the Appellants have not established that engaging in the Project as approved will cause serious harm to human health.

“The Tribunal finds that the Appellants have not established, on the facts of this case, that the renewable energy approval process violated the Appellants’ right to security of the person under section 7 of the Charter,” reads the decision.

The case is listed as Bovaird v. Director, Number 13-070 to 13-075. It will be posted on the ERT website although it hadn’t been this week.

The Director is Vic Schroter of the Ministry of Environment, who issued DWP’s Renewable Energy Approval on June 10, 2013. On June 25, Roselyn Bovaird, CORE (Conserve

Our Rural Environment), VanDerZagg (farms), John Maguire and Kathleen Kurtin appealed on the basis of irreversible harm to the environment and animal health, as did Dennis Sanford on the basis of serious harm to human health.

Then, on July 14, Mr. Sanford was joined by the other parties in raising the Section 7 challenge.

The ERT issued its 127-page decision on the morning of Monday, Dec. 23, after hearing 26 days of evidence.

The decision cites three main issues, but the hearing actually dealt with five “sub-issues” at great lengths: effects on soil and productive farm land generally, especially Honeywood loam; water resources; the Niagara Escarpment Plan; and bats and other animals.

The decision may be subject to appeal but Dennis Sanford said in a phone interview Tuesday that, because of the holidays, it might be difficult to meet the 15-day deadline for an appeal.

Mr. Sanford, represented by anti-wind lawyer Eric Gillespie, heads Wind Resistance Melancthon. He had not spoken with his committee or lawyer at the time of the interview.

Noting that there has been only one instance of the ERT over-ruling a wind turbine approval, he said adverse health effects are difficult to prove. The one instance of over-ruling involved the habitat of a Blanding’s (Emydoidea bandingil) turtle at the site of a proposed Gilead Power wind farm in Prince Edward County.

In fairness to the tribunal with respect to timing, Chair Heather Gibbs had stated at the outset that it had to meet a deadline.

The individual sub-issues are covered in separate stories.

Source:  ER Tribunal rules in favour of DWP | Written By WES KELLER | Orangeville Citizen | 2014-01-02 | www.citizen.on.ca

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.