[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Sierra Club’s inconsistency  

Credit:  News-Times | December 20, 2013 | www.carolinacoastonline.com ~~

At the Dec. 16 Carteret County Commissioner’s meeting, Robert Scull, who identified himself as representing the Sierra Club, said during his public comments that while the Sierra Club had opposed the Pantego Wind Project in Beaufort County it is not opposed to the Mill Pond Industrial Wind Project in Carteret County. My immediate reaction was “What the heck?” Why does the Sierra Club think that it’s OK to protect a goose in Beaufort County but not a gander in Carteret County? Maybe it’s just that the Sierra Club has not done its environmental homework or that it is simply supporting an “environmental” policy driven by the current political environment.

It appears from the public record that the Sierra Club and the Audubon Society opposed the Beaufort County Pantego Project because of the potential mass slaughter of a lot of pretty and some endangered birds. The Audubon Society has already gone on record expressing concern over the Mill Pond Industrial Wind Project in Carteret County that could result in the death of some rare birds and bats. In its letter to the North Carolina Utility Commission, the Audubon Society said:

“The Mill Pond Wind Farm lies mostly within the Croatan National Forest Important Bird Area (5,800 acres of the total project area of 7,363 acres). This globally significant IBA [Important Bird Area] hosts a wide array of land bird species including the federally endangered Red-cockaded Woodpecker, and other high conservation priority species like Bachman’s Sparrow and Prairie Warbler. The wetlands embedded in the project area also support a variety of wetland dependent species like Bald Eagles, wintering waterfowl, and a variety of high priority marsh birds like Black Rail, Virginia Rail, and other species.”

Based on Mr. Scull’s statement, the Sierra Club must not know we in Carteret County, like Beaufort County, have IBAs that include a federally endangered species. Alternatively, maybe the Sierra Club just jumped into bed with the Department of Interior’s new rule that says it is OK for wind energy companies to whack American bald eagles to death (Reference – http://beforeitsnews.com/food-and-farming/2013/12/interior-department-gvies-wind-farms-30-year-exemption-from-bird-kills-2458462.html).

In either case, the Sierra Club’s position now seems to be that it is OK to kill birds and bats in Carteret County, and its position was stated on the public record during the county commissioner’s meeting.

If you disagree with the Sierra Club, make your concerns known to the N.C. Utilities Commission by submitting your comments by email to statements@ncuc.net. Cite docket number SP-3085 Sub 0, and include your name, address and phone number in your email. While according to NCUC Dec. 18, a deadline for comments has not yet been set contrary to announcements that the deadline is Dec. 23rd, NCUC will soon announce that it will hold a public hearing in Carteret County on the Mill Pond project. If you send comments it will notify you of the hearing date by email. Otherwise, the public hearing notice will be published in local papers, and of course many local groups will use a variety of methods to let you know of the hearing date so you can participate.


Stella, N.C.

Source:  News-Times | December 20, 2013 | www.carolinacoastonline.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch