[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Green light for Wooler wind mast  

Credit:  Berwick Advertiser | 19 December 2013 | www.berwick-advertiser.co.uk ~~

Controversial plans to erect a wind turbine close to ancient monuments and historical sites in Wooler are set to go ahead after a campaigner lost his last-ditch bid to halt the development.

Landowner Robert Tait plans to install the 18m tall turbine on land next to his home, just 750m from the site of the Battle of Homildon Hill, which was recounted in Shakespeare’s Henry IV.

He was granted permission by Northumberland County Council in January, but objector, John Lancashire, took the case to the High Court in a challenge to the legality of the council’s decision.

Mr Lancashire, of White Gables, was concerned about the impact on the landscape and the plethora of historical sites near to Mr Tait’s home at Highburn House Caravan Park.

Delivering judgment on Mr Lancashire’s claim for judicial review, High Court judge, Mr Justice Blake, threw out his case, paving the way for the plans to go ahead.

Challenging the grant of permission as “unlawful”, Mr Lancashire’s barrister, Richard Harwood QC, pointed to a string of alleged deficiencies in the council’s decision-making process.

In advice to the planning committee, the council’s planning officer had failed to mention that the site was in an area categorised as “high sensitivity” and so deserving of greater protection, he said.

But Mr Justice Blake dismissed every last one of the grounds of challenge, saying the conditions relating to noise were “lawful” and “capable of effective enforcement”, while any visual harm which might be caused to the monuments was “minimal”.

He added: “This was a case where a planning judgment had to be exercised about the impact of the development.”

Source:  Berwick Advertiser | 19 December 2013 | www.berwick-advertiser.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter