[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

National Park urges council to refuse Guisborough wind turbines application  

Credit:  By Mike Morgan | Gazette Live | 16 Dec 2013 | www.gazettelive.co.uk ~~

Developers wanting to site a massive wind turbine scheme on hills above Guisborough have received a major blow to their multi million pound plans.

North-east family-owned business Banks Renewables wants to build a five-turbine, 433 foot high Bank Field wind farm on agricultural land on the north side of the A171 overlooking the town and has consulted with locals over the last year.

But now, following discussion at its planning committee, members of the North York Moors National Park Authority are urging Redcar and Cleveland Council to refuse the application.

The council’s decision is expected sometime in the New Year.

NYMNPA members say the proposed development would have “significant and harmful impacts in terms of views of important iconic landscape features and sites along the edge of the North York Moors.”

These would be, in particular, Roseberry Topping and the scarp edge of the Cleveland Hills, which form an important landscape feature of the north western boundary of the National Park.

Peter Berry, of the Fight In Guisborough to Halt Wind Turbines group (FIGHT), said campaigners are “extremely pleased”.

He said: “This confirms our belief that these enormous structures will destroy the views enjoyed by residents of and visitors to the area.

“Banks Renewables say this will be compensated by the possibility that the turbines will offset the emission of up to 22,280 tonnes of CO2 per year, contribute to national targets for greenhouse gas reduction and provide electricity for around 9,800 households.

“These claims are laudable, but would be equally achievable if the turbines were located at a more suitable brownfield site.

“They have also stated there will be a community package of £85,000 a year. But this miniscule amount squeezed from enormous profits generated by this wind farm for the developer and landowner will hardly compensate for the drop in house values for the people nearest the wind farm.

“We realise the NYMNPA recommendation is not binding on the borough council, but hope strong consideration will be given to it when its planning committee decides.”

FIGHT has already claimed the position of the turbines will destroy one of the most iconic views in the area, “particularly the view across Roseberry Topping – one of the most beautiful in England.”

Phil Dyke, Banks Renewables development director, said: “While we’re disappointed by the outcome of the National Park’s vote, we were encouraged by recognition from some delegates of the positive impact of our proposals.

“We’ll continue to work with all interested parties across the community to ensure they’re able to make up their minds about the proposed scheme based on accurate, comprehensive information.

“We remain certain this is a carefully-designed scheme sited in a wholly appropriate location for this sort of development.”

Anyone wanting more info on the proposals visit www.banksgroup.co.uk/bank-field

Source:  By Mike Morgan | Gazette Live | 16 Dec 2013 | www.gazettelive.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch