[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Windfarm report says ‘no areas’ of Angus have capacity for large developments  

Credit:  By Graham Brown | The Courier | 14 December 2013 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~

A key planning blueprint appears to have closed the door on future large-scale windfarm developments in Angus.

The long-awaited strategic landscape capacity assessment for wind energy in Angus was commissioned to assist the decision-making process over wind energy development proposals and planning applications.

In a statement already welcomed by anti-windfarm campaigners, the assessment has determined that “there are no areas of Angus with an underlying capacity for extensive windfarms with large-scale turbines”.

Stretching to almost 200 pages, the report (PDF link) was drawn up by consultants Ironside Farrar after being commissioned by Scottish Natural Heritage in conjunction with Angus and Aberdeenshire councils.

The consultants term turbines of more than 80 metres in height as large.

Angus has only one operational large-scale windfarm, comprising eight 81m turbines, at Ark Hill, near Glamis.

Earlier this week, Scottish Government reporters cleared the way for a six-turbine scheme at Govals Farm, adjacent to the A90 between Forfar and Dundee, but dismissed an appeal over a five-turbine plan for Dodd Hill, north of Tealing.

There are 116 turbines operational or consented in Angus more than 15 metres high. The environmental consultants deem the “dramatically presented” definition between highland and lowland as a key factor affecting larger schemes.

Ray Gibson of Angus Communities Windfarm Action Group welcomed the statement in relation to large-scale turbines, but said the group remained “seriously concerned” about small cluster and single turbine development across the county.

Source:  By Graham Brown | The Courier | 14 December 2013 | www.thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch