Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Wind farm poses no threat to bighorn sheep
Credit: By JEFF D. GORMAN | Courthouse News Service | December 12, 2013 | www.courthousenews.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
A California wind-energy project will not threaten an endangered species of sheep, a federal appeals court ruled.
The Protect Our Communities Foundation, Donna Tisdale and Backcountry Against Dumps challenged the U.S. Department of Interior’s decision to allow Ocotillo Express to build 112 wind-turbine generations on 10,151 acres of public land in the Sonoran Desert in Imperial County, Calif.
In addition to the Interior Department, the plaintiffs named the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and three of its officers as defendants.
The foundation argued that the government’s approval of the wind project violated the Endangered Species Act by jeopardizing the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep. The Interior Department issued a Biological Opinion that the 955 sheep would not be jeopardized by the project. The sheep have been plagued by disease, parasites and predators, and their numbers were as low as 276 in 1996.
In an opinion written by District Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel, the Southern District of California ruled that the biological opinion correctly concluded that even if the sheep lost up to 5,000 acres of their habitat, they would still be able to connect and reproduce.
In addition, Curiel wrote that the government properly considered the fact that the sheep can be poor dispersers.
“Federal defendants argue that the sheep tend to be poor dispersers but only outside of their home ranges. Within their home range, the PBS are more likely to avoid the project and move to another part of their home range,” he wrote.
Also, Curiel stated that the government properly considered the effect of noise and visual disturbance for the sheep, citing their tolerance of noise on Interstate 8.
“Vision is the primary sense the PBS use to detect predators,” he wrote. “Therefore, the wind turbines would be perceived as a threat and would lead to habitat avoidance.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: