[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Thumbs down: Wind industry is getting a pass on wildlife deaths  

Credit:  The Herald-Dispatch | Dec. 10, 2013 | www.herald-dispatch.com ~~

There seems to be a double standard.

After years of hounding the coal industry about wildlife habitat and other environmental concerns, the Obama administration is taking a much more lenient stance with the wind-power industry.

Friday, the Interior Department said it would allow wind-farm companies to kill or injure eagles without the fear of prosecution for up to three decades. There has been a growing awareness that the huge wind-turbine blades are dangerous for birds, but a recent case against Duke Energy for killing bald and golden eagles was the first time a wind-energy company had been prosecuted under a law protecting migratory birds.

Meanwhile, federal authorities have approved a West Virginia wind farm’s habitat conservation plan, even though it acknowledges that some endangered bats would likely be killed over the next 25 years. Nationally, wind turbines destroy thousands of bats every day, according to some reports.

Wind turbines range in size, but many have a rotating diameter of 200-300 feet and reach speeds of more than 100 miles per hour. Eagles, for example, are typically looking down for food and can just fly into the blade.

Clearly, wind farms are just one of many threats to birds and bats. Power lines, motorists, pollution and a host of other forces take a greater toll every day.

But wind is still a small industry, producing only about 3.5 percent of the electrical power in the United States last year. It is difficult to estimate what the wildlife impact will be if turbines are used on a much broader scale.

There are environmental costs that come with almost every energy source, and the wind industry should not receive favorable treatment just because it has been perceived to be a “green” technology.

Source:  The Herald-Dispatch | Dec. 10, 2013 | www.herald-dispatch.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.