[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Golden, bald eagles join list of government losers  

Credit:  By Albuquerque Journal Editorial Board | www.abqjournal.com ~~

It’s often said the government shouldn’t be in the business of picking winners and losers. One big reason is that for the losers, it’s often a very big loss.

For instance, a bad bet on solar-panel maker Solyndra cost taxpayers $535 million. And despite that costly track record the Obama administration is once again picking winners and losers in green energy. This time, the winner is the wind-energy industry, the losers are bald and golden eagles.

Right now, dozens of eagles are killed each year after flying into wind turbine blades that are as wide as a passenger jet’s wings and spin up to 170 miles an hour at the wingtips. Under a new Interior Department rule wind energy companies will be allowed to kill or injure eagles for up to 30 years without fear of prosecution. Wind farm owners must have a permit, of course, are asked to try not to kill the birds and have to report how many they kill each year.

Because, as John Anderson of the American Wind Energy Association says, “This permit program is about conservation.” Well, make that conserving fossil fuels, not a living symbol of the United States.

The National Audubon Society plans to challenge this ridiculous “blank check” ruling. It should.

Meanwhile, what are the chances that extractive industries would get a similar response at the hands of this administration? None.

While the extractive industries like oil and gas are regulated – in many cases appropriately so – in an effort to mitigate environmental damage, the administration is once again picking winners and losers by showing it has no inclination to apply the same standard to one of its chosen endeavors.

This editorial first appeared in the Albuquerque Journal. It was written by members of the editorial board and is unsigned as it represents the opinion of the newspaper rather than the writers.

Source:  By Albuquerque Journal Editorial Board | www.abqjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.