[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Tipton board prepares wind ordinance modifications  

Credit:  By Martin Slagter | Kokomo Tribune | December 3, 2013 | www.kokomotribune.com ~~

TIPTON – Citizens of Tipton County had their final say Monday on revisions to the ordinance that dictates how wind energy developments may be built in the county. The changes will be discussed by the Tipton Board of Commissioners in a couple of weeks.

The Tipton County Commissioners tabled the vote in early November on a measure that would modify the county’s rules for wind farm developments, saying they needed more time to review the proposed changes.

The Tipton County Plan Commission recommended approval of the changes on Oct. 17. Among the modifications are increased setback requirements and changes concerning noise, lighting and shadow flicker.

After hearing some citizens speak in favor of passing the revised wind ordinance at Monday’s board of commissioners meeting, Tipton County Commissioner Joe VanBibber said he believes issues like fines and penalties, as well as economic development, will be addressed at the commission’s next meeting on Dec. 16.

“The penalties and the fines will be increased and cleared up within the ordinance,” VanBibber said Monday. “There were some issues on economic development agreements that I think we’ll clear up. The economic development agreement is negotiated by the commissioners and I think there will be some language that will be cleaned up. I think the fines will be substantially increased and will be specific to wind and not specific to the entire ordinance.”

Surveyor Jason Henderson said in November the proposed complaint process will use an out-of-county arbitrator and the county council would be asked to establish a non-reverting fund of $5,000, paid for by wind companies, to pay the arbitrator.

If approved, the amended ordinance will change wind turbine setbacks to 1,500 feet from a property line, 2,640 feet from a residential dwelling and one mile from a city, town or county boundary.

As time passes, residents in Tipton County are finding that setbacks originally set at 1,000 feet from a property line don’t address noise concerns, Tipton County Citizens for Responsible Development Secretary Kirsten Leonard said.

“A number of people are talking about being sleep-deprived,” she said. “It’s very complicated. I think the issue we have in the Midwest is that the 1,000-foot setback from a home was invented out of nowhere. I think they’re realizing that is extremely short. In the case of one of the people we know, the nearest turbine is 1,800 feet away and it’s resulting in such severe problems that he can’t sleep.”

Under the new ordinance, the noise level will be set at 5 decibels over ambient levels, shadow flicker will be limited to a maximum of 30 minutes per day and 30 hours per year, and steps will have to be taken to shield the flashing red lights on the top of each wind turbine.

During Monday’s commissioners meeting, members of the Tipton County CRD spoke out in support of passing the revised wind ordinance as well as the extending the current moratorium on development of any more wind farms through Dec. 31.

Any future expansion of the already operating Wildcat Wind Farm in eastern Tipton County would be covered by the proposed changes.

However, the proposed Prairie Breeze Wind Farm in northwestern Tipton County would be governed by the current ordinance.

CRD President Jeff Hoover said future consideration of wind farms in the county should be put on hold until issues like noise and property value are resolved.

“For a true cost-benefit analysis, it is also important to determine the actual income to the county,” he said. “Until these issues are resolved, and we can confirm that the proposed ordinance prevents recurrence, it would be inappropriate to consider any potential applications.”

The CRD voiced its support of commissioners having “more teeth” than they do in the current ordinance to enable them to force resolution of documented problems.

Source:  By Martin Slagter | Kokomo Tribune | December 3, 2013 | www.kokomotribune.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch