[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

So much for sound testing  

Credit:  Sun Journal | November 29, 2013 | www.sunjournal.com ~~

I attended a state Board of Environmental Protection meeting concerning the permit for Saddleback Ridge Wind on Nov. 7.

The developer’s lawyer said over and over again that the data shows no wind project “out of compliance” in Maine. Why? Applicants must set up a toll free complaint hotline, then the DEP determines if complaints to the hotline are valid, which could take months, or years.

It has been suggested, worldwide, that local boards of health handle these hotlines.

In its March 2013 ruling on the Friends of Maine’s Mountains and Friends of Saddleback Mountain’s claim that the BEP abused its discretion when determining which nighttime sound level limit should apply to the Saddleback Ridge Wind application, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court noted that “It is unclear from the record how the Department and Board intend to enforce sound level limits for wind projects.”

At the Nov. 7 meeting, a BEP member asked why the third party sound specialist was not present. The board member expressed that he had a question and a lot of money was spent on this specialist, asking “where is he?”

The law on testing sound was cited, and twice I heard testing was done “downwind from noise source, between 11 p.m. and 5 a.m.”

No one on the BEP board asked if the monitors were downwind. So much for testing data.

Were all the tests taken that are required?

DEP has stated that Mars Hill, Vinalhaven and Beaver Ridge are all “so sorry” projects. Noise rulings did not apply.

Alice McKay Barnett, Carthage

Source:  Sun Journal | November 29, 2013 | www.sunjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch