[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Expiring federal subsidies may put Cape Wind on the ropes  

Credit:  By Marc Brown | Sunday, December 1, 2013 | www.fosters.com ~~

Grim news is on the horizon for the developers of the Cape Wind Project, which would place hundreds of wind turbines in Nantucket Sound. The federal Production Tax Credit (PTC) is set to expire on Dec. 31 and without an extension it is unlikely that Cape Wind will secure adequate financing to begin the project – reasonable speculation given that developers have yet to secure the financing needed to reach the 5% projects spending threshold necessary to trigger the PTC.

The most astonishing aspect of this failure is the fact that Cape Wind secured Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) for 77.5% of its power at over 20 cents per Kwh – five times the average wholesale price of electricity in New England for 2012. However, according to supporters of the project, that won’t be the cost that will be passed onto ratepayers. Why? Because the cost of electricity from Cape Wind will be mixed with other (i.e. cheaper) generating sources. (Which begs the question “Why can’t businesses and residents just have the cheaper power and not Cape Wind’s?)

Cape Wind is the poster child for bad public policy that has government intervening in markets to pick winners and losers. Cape Wind’s developers have enjoyed all of the benefits associated with politically preferred projects: Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) that require electricity suppliers to purchase a percentage of their generation from renewable resources (thus the overpriced PPAs); the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), which is a carbon tax that favors emissions-free generation; and tax credits that could capitalize 30% of the project. On top of this, the project is seeking a massive loan guarantee from the federal government. All this has been done with complete disregard to ratepayers, but despite these advantages, the project still cannot get off the ground.

Why are private investors giving the project a good leaving alone? Likely because its business plan is dubious at best. While the proposed capacity of the project is 468MW, the expected production is 178MW, which makes the project’s assumed capacity factor approximately 37%. This is a very generous estimate given that the Department of Energy pegs current wind farm capacity in the Northeast at 24%–meaning that Cape Wind would have to produce 50% more power than other wind farms in the region. A study from Harvard University indicates that the actual generation from large-scale wind farms may be substantially less than anticipated. Led by Harvard applied physicist David Keith, the study indicated the generating capacity of large-scale wind farms larger than 100 square kilometers could peak anywhere from 0.5 and 1 watts per square meter. Prior estimates put these figures at 2 to 7 watts per square meter. This means that production calculations may be vastly overestimating how many KWhs will be generated – information that surely is not part of Cape Wind’s calculus.

This past April, NERA sponsored a survey by the University of New Hampshire Survey Center. Here are a few key points from the survey:

■ 69% of Massachusetts residents feel the Cape Wind Project should not receive federal loan guarantees in addition to the other subsidies and the lucrative PPA agreements.

■ A majority of respondents (50%) feel that the Cape Wind project should be halted immediately, with only 41% of Massachusetts residents supporting the Cape Wind project.

■ Most respondents would not support Cape Wind if they knew it would have negative impacts on tourism and property values (63%) or when they learn that ratepayers will pay billions in higher rates over the life of the project (65%)

■ When provided information about costs of generation, a majority of people would prefer to get their power from Natural Gas and Hydro (59%) with only 25% preferring to get their power from very expensive solar or Cape Wind.

So what will Cape Wind developers do should the PTC expire without the project qualifying for the funds? They can scale back the project to the point where they meet the power demands of the PPA, but that would still require funding that has been elusive thus far. More likely, without the PTC and a bailout in the form of a Department of Energy loan guarantee (think Solyndra) the Cape Wind Project will fade away – and thankfully save ratepayers billions in the process.

New England will need additional power to ensure a stable and reliable grid in the future, but we don’t need to saddle residents and businesses with inflated electricity rates along the way. It’s time for politicians’ pet projects to disappear and be replaced by common-sense energy solutions that will provide the region with affordable and reliable electricity for households and making the region more friendly to the businesses that provide the jobs that we so desperately need.

Marc Brown is the Executive Director of the New England Ratepayers Association, the nonprofit dedicated to protecting ratepayers in New England

Source:  By Marc Brown | Sunday, December 1, 2013 | www.fosters.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter