LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind energy regulations stalled . . . again 

Credit:  by Christine Stuart | CT News Junkie | Nov 27, 2013 | www.ctnewsjunkie.com ~~

For the fourth time this year, a vote on wind generation regulations – which include legal framework for how the state should regulate those towering turbines – has been postponed.

After a huddle with a liaison from the governor’s office, Robert Stein, chairman of the Connecticut Siting Council, asked Tuesday to withdraw the proposed regulations for wind generation in Connecticut.

He said there simply wasn’t a consensus within the committee to approve the regulations that the council had submitted.

Sen. Bob Duff, D-Norwalk, said he would like to understand why the committee was at an impasse.

“What are we trying to get at?” Duff said. “At some point we need to be able to move the ball forward on these regulations.”

Sen. Leonard Fasano, R-North Haven, said it should have been no surprise to the Siting Council that the Regulations Review Committee was going to reject its proposal since it submitted the same proposal it rejected without prejudice back in September.

He said the conditions under which the Siting Council can waive certain provisions of the regulations is a concern and is “giving a lot of people some angst.”

Consider the issue of decommissioning a wind turbine. Fasano said the Siting Council has the right to ask for a bond from the company that wants to erect the turbine. The bond would help ensure that if the company decides 20 years later that wind turbines are not the wave of the future, the taxpayers don’t have to pay to take it down.

“If these companies leave these towers where they are, you have problems,” Fasano said.

He said the taxpayer shouldn’t be on the hook if a company decides to abandon a turbine. There’s also issues about giving the council the power to waive noise, setback, and flicker regulations for projects.

Rep. Selim Noujaim, co-chairman of the committee, said they had a number of questions two months ago and it was the job of the Siting Council to get the answers. Instead, the Siting Council resubmitted the same application.

“We’re not against wind power,” Noujaim said after the meeting. “I’m a fan of doing things right.”

Chris Phelps, executive director of Environment Connecticut, said he was disappointed in the decision of the Siting Council to withdraw its proposal.

“We’re probably the only state in the country banning wind power,” Phelps said.

For Phelps, this isn’t about the regulations as much as it’s about renewable energy.

“Six or seven legislators are sending a loud message about Connecticut that it doesn’t want clean, renewable energy in its own backyard,” Phelps said. “They want no wind power at all.”

Noujaim said that’s absolutely not true. He said he just wants to make sure it’s done right.

Joyce Hemingson, president of Fairwind CT, said she was happy lawmakers were taking their time. She said the regulations as they stand now are the most lenient in all of New England.

She said the organization is not for or against wind power. It’s an organization, according to its website, that is concerned about the the social, health, and economic impact of unregulated wind turbines near busy roads and near residential neighborhoods.

“It’s not a NIMBY issue,” Hemingson stressed.

The state has had a moratorium on wind generation for almost two years as it has struggled to come up with regulations.

“I think we should have regulations,” Gov. Dannel P. Malloy said Tuesday at an unrelated press conference.

He said he’s not being critical at the moment, but at some point if the state keeps picking off alternative sources of energy it shouldn’t be surprised when the state doesn’t meet the goal of obtaining 20 percent of its energy from renewable sources by 2020.

Source:  by Christine Stuart | CT News Junkie | Nov 27, 2013 | www.ctnewsjunkie.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon