[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Application to remove noise abatement clause on wind farm near Stockton to be debated  

Credit:  By Chris Webber, Reporter | Darlington and Stockton Times | 26 November 2013 | www.darlingtonandstocktontimes.co.uk ~~

A controversial plan to build a small windfarm is to be debated by a council once again, despite being approved two years ago.

Permission to erect four 125m wind turbines at Lambs Hill, Stillington, between Stockton and Darlington was originally granted in December, 2012, despite protests from villagers.

However a condition that noise must be monitored and kept to a minimum was imposed and now the energy company, Banks Renewables, has applied to have that condition removed.

That application has led to a fresh wave of objections, including from MP for Stockton North, Alex Cunningham, who supported the original application but has now written to Stockton Borough Council to lodge his protest at the noise condition being removed.

In total 41 objections have been received including from Stillington and Whitton Parish council, Grindon Parish Council, Sadberge Parish Council and Bishopton Parish Council. The Campaign for the Protection of Rural England has also opposed the condition being removed. A 72-signature petition has also been submitted to the council.

Apart from noise impact the objectors made more general protests about visual impact, lack of research and information about noise levels, impact on wildlife and impact on house prices.

Stockton borough councillor Andrew Stephenson also objected. He said: “The regulations state it is up to Banks to monitor all the rules attached to the planning application. What Banks is attempting to do is pass this duty on to local residents and the council. This should not be considered.”

Banks Renewables has previously argued the change was a technical matter and stressed the noise issues would be managed and monitored. Stringent rules about noise emissions would remain.

Planning officers at Stockton council have recommended the authority agree to remove Condition 45, which refers to noise monitoring and control. However it was recommended that the authority did not simply rely upon general noise abatement law but impose a new condition based on the authority’s Environmental Management Plan which already has rules about noise.

A report to be considered by Stockton council’s planning committee on Wednesday, December 4 at 1.30pm in Stockton Central Library, said: “Whilst it is accepted that Condition 45 of the initial approval should not be retained, there remains an opportunity to secure greater control than simply relying upon statutory nuisance legislation.”

Source:  By Chris Webber, Reporter | Darlington and Stockton Times | 26 November 2013 | www.darlingtonandstocktontimes.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.