[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Vermont high court upholds convictions in wind protest 

Credit:  Written by WILSON RING | Associated Press | Nov. 22, 2013 | www.burlingtonfreepress.com ~~

MONTPELIER – The Vermont Supreme Court has upheld the conviction of six people arrested for trespassing on Lowell Mountain almost two years ago as part of a protest of the construction of the 21-turbine Kingdom Community Wind project.

The high court Friday rejected the legal arguments from the six based on who had ownership or the legal rights to control the land where they were arrested, including that the jury should have been made aware that there was legal uncertainty about who could give the protesters permission to be on the land where they were arrested in December 2011.

The six were apparently proceeding under the theory that if they could show during the trial that the existing property lines were inaccurate, the utility building the wind project could not have obtained the right to the property, the majority decision said.

“That is simply not the case,” read the decision, written by Chief Justice Paul Reiber.

But in a dissenting opinion, Justice John Dooley said the jury should have been given a more complete explanation about the dispute by the trial court judge so that members could consider that in their deliberations.

“As the result of the court’s instruction allowing the jury to find lawful possession based on nothing more than control of the land, defendants were convicted of criminal trespass, subjecting them to fines and potential incarceration, without regard to whether they had, or reasonably believed that they had, the consent of the true owners of the property upon which they were arrested,” said Dooley’s dissent.

One of the defendants, Anne Morse of Craftsbury Common, said Friday she was disappointed with the decision.

“We’re concerned about the decision, because it really validates the corporate domination of our regulatory and our legal processes,” Morse said. “Green Mountain Power was able to obtain (permission from the state) to build a destructive ridge-line wind project that failed to achieve what they claimed to achieve, which is a reduction in carbon emissions.”

The Orleans County State’s Attorney’s Office declined comment.

Green Mountain Power spokeswoman Dorothy Schnure said Friday her company had nothing to do with the criminal case.

“We have a legal system in this country that listens to all sides and makes a determination,” she said. “In this case, it’s been determined the convictions were appropriate.”

The protesters were arrested while they blocked a road used to build the Kingdom Community Wind Project owned by Green Mountain Power. They argued the owner of the land had given them permission to be there.

But there was a dispute about who owned or had control of the land where they were arrested, an Albany couple who had given them permission to be on the land, or the utility, Green Mountain Power.

In giving instructions to the jury, the judge rejected the defendants’ arguments that the jury be told to consider who had the right to possess the land, the utility or the couple.

The six were sentenced to community service.

The Kingdom Community Wind project is now in operation.

Source:  Written by WILSON RING | Associated Press | Nov. 22, 2013 | www.burlingtonfreepress.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky