[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind farm bill would let utilities, developers be sued  

Credit:  By Thomas Content of the Journal Sentinel | Nov. 20, 2013 | www.jsonline.com ~~

Homeowners who live near wind turbines told state lawmakers Wednesday they should be able to sue for damages because of the problems with sleeping, headaches and other health issues that emerged after wind farms were built.

They spoke in favor of a bill introduced by state Sen. Frank Lasee (R-De Pere), whose district includes a wind farm in Brown County where several families have moved from their homes, citing health concerns.

Studies by acoustics experts at that project concluded that low-frequency sound was apparent at the homes near the turbines. The state Public Service Commission concluded more study is needed on the issue.

Wind energy advocates say no link has yet been found between the presence of the sound and health problems experienced. Wind energy critics say that wasn’t the subject of the study.

Lasee said the bill is needed to give homeowners some recourse if they have experienced problems.

Representatives of the state’s utilities and Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce, Wisconsin’s largest business lobby, are opposing the bill, along with wind power companies. Opponents say the bill, as written, is overly broad and could lead to lawsuits.

That runs counter to the agenda of Republican Gov. Scott Walker and the Legislature on the topic of tort reform, said Joe Sullivan of Wind on the Wires, a group that includes wind energy companies.

“When I talked to my members, they look at this and say in general they like the direction that Wisconsin is going in terms of tort reform. They looked at this and said this would be our exemption from tort reform. That’s not a messages we should be sending to major national and international companies.”

Homeowners who testified said they hope the bill boosts discussions about whether Wisconsin’s wind siting standards are sufficient to protect nearby homeowners. Wind energy supporters say the standards in Wisconsin aren’t lax.

“I’d like to see the noise reduced. I’d also like to see a property value protection plan,” said Jeff Bump of Cambria, whose home is near turbines in the We Energies Glacier Hills Wind Park, Wisconsin’s largest wind farm.

Bump says he can no longer sleep in his upstairs bedroom because of noise from the turbines.

“I do not think a privately owned company should have the right to take our sleep away,” said Elizabeth Eberts of Marshfield, whose home is near turbines in the We Energies Blue Sky Green Field wind development.

We Energies spokesman Brian Manthey said the Milwaukee utility has investigated concerns raised by homeowners. “We have worked with residents – including those residents that testified today – to mitigate those concerns.”

The utility built and operated the turbines in compliance with the state’s noise standards and the agreements it negotiated with local communities, he said.

The hearing was before a committee chaired by Sen. Glenn Grothman (R-West Bend), who pledged additional meetings on the issue.

In testimony submitted to the committee, William Skewes, head of the Wisconsin Utilities Association, said the bill would drive up liability insurance costs for utilities, costs that would be reflected in utility customers’ rates.

Utilities said they built wind farms to comply with the Legislature’s direction to expand cleaner energy sources. Wisconsin’s renewable energy standard calls for 10% of the state’s electricity to be supplied by renewable energy by 2015.

“Requiring the utilities to build renewable projects, requiring them to comply with all permitting terms and conditions, and then passing a law to target them for significant liability risk for following Wisconsin law and policy places Wisconsin utilities in an untenable position,” Skewes said.

Source:  By Thomas Content of the Journal Sentinel | Nov. 20, 2013 | www.jsonline.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter